Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Evaluation of Exon Inclusion Induced by Splice Switching Antisense Oligonucleotides in SMA Patient Fibroblasts
Published on: May 11, 2018
Effectiveness and Safety of Nusinersen and Risdiplam in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Review
Amin Mehrabian1, Peter Auguste1, Amy Grove1
1Centre for Evidence and Implementation Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nusinersen and risdiplam show clinical effectiveness for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) treatment, improving motor function and survival rates. However, outcome variability and adverse events necessitate further research and high-quality trials.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Genetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a rare genetic neuromuscular disorder causing progressive muscle weakness and mobility loss.
- SMA impacts patients and caregivers significantly, requiring extensive medical and supportive care.
- SMA is categorized into Types 1-4, with potential for presymptomatic identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the safety and effectiveness of nusinersen and risdiplam in treating Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search of research databases, websites, and existing systematic reviews was performed.
- Data screening, extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent authors, with a third resolving discrepancies.
- A total of 131 studies across 148 sources were included in this review, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024512226).
Main Results:
- Both nusinersen and risdiplam demonstrated improvements in motor function and achievement of developmental milestones, alongside high survival rates in most SMA types.
- While motor function gains were consistent, outcomes related to bulbar and respiratory function, and ventilation requirements, exhibited variability.
- Adverse events were frequently observed across all treatments and SMA types, with serious cases, including fatalities in Types 1 and 2, being reported.
Conclusions:
- Nusinersen and risdiplam exhibit clinical effectiveness and safety for all SMA types, but outcome variability and limited comparative data create uncertainty.
- The current evidence base highlights the need for more rigorous, high-quality randomized controlled trials to further solidify treatment efficacy and safety profiles for SMA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...

