Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice
Published on: February 24, 2023
Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring metrics
Ling-Wei Chen1, Chee Wai Ku2, Ruther Teo Zheng3
1Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Master of Public Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Aims:
We evaluated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived metrics for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Methods:
We analyzed data from 167 pregnant participants who had ≥ 3 days of CGM data at 18-24 weeks' gestation and who underwent 75-gram oral-glucose-tolerance-tests at 24-28 weeks in a multi-ethnic prospective cohort. Predictive performance of CGM metrics was assessed using the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUROC) with 20 repetitions of 5-fold cross-validation; optimal cut-points were determined using Youden's index.
Results:
There were 30 (18 %) GDM cases. The strongest predictors were %time-above-7.8-mmol/L (%TA7.8) [AUROC (95 % CI): 0.862 (0.780, 0.945); cut-point: 1.23 %; sensitivity: 0.800; specificity: 0.847] and the hyperglycemia-component-of-the-Glycemic-Risk-Index (Hyper-GRI) [0.862 (0.779, 0.945); cut-point: 0.79; sensitivity: 0.767; specificity: 0.883]. J-index, standard deviation (SD), and mean-amplitude-of-glucose-excursions(MAGE) also achieved AUROCs > 0.80. The predictive performance of these metrics was stronger in women with BMI < 23 kg/m2 (n = 89; AUROC range: 0.813-0.882) than in those with BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 (n = 78; AUROC range: 0.657-0.756). Among Chinese participants (n = 142), %TA7.8 and J-index had AUROC > 0.80; in non-Chinese participants (n = 25), SD performed best (AUROC: 0.845). Adding individual CGM metrics to a model including maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, job status, ethnicity, history of GDM, and family history of diabetes improved the AUROC from 0.642 to 0.895 (%TA7.8), 0.867 (Hyper-GRI), 0.877 (J-index), 0.868 (SD), and 0.848 (MAGE).
Conclusions:
CGM-derived metrics show good performance in predicting GDM and potential for earlier detection of adverse pregnancy glycemic profiles.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Glucose Homeostasis: Regulation of Blood Glucose
During fasting, when blood glucose levels are low, the pancreas secretes glucagon. it...
Hormones Regulating Blood Glucose
In addition to accelerating glucose uptake and utilization, insulin has...

