Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Protocol for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Symptom Provocation to Treat Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
Published on: November 25, 2025
Reducing target E-field variability in repetitive TMS through online motion compensation
Sarah Grosshagauer1, Michael Woletz1, Marlen Becher2
1High Field MR Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
This study quantifies motion during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and introduces a novel method to adjust stimulation amplitude, significantly reducing electric field variability for more reliable major depressive disorder treatment.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) effectiveness hinges on precise targeting and dosing for neurophysiological outcomes, especially in treating major depressive disorder (MDD).
- Neuronavigation aids accurate coil placement, but minor coil deviations during extended rTMS protocols can substantially alter the induced electric field (E-field).
- Motion-induced E-field variability poses a challenge to consistent rTMS treatment delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively analyze coil-target movement during rTMS sessions.
- To introduce and evaluate a novel methodology for compensating motion-induced E-field variability.
- To enhance the reliability of rTMS for clinical applications like MDD treatment.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed coil-target movement (position, rotation) in 200 rTMS sessions across 20 adults with MDD.
- Simulated induced E-fields and quantified variability within and across sessions.
- Developed a real-time algorithm adjusting stimulator output based on coil position and precomputed E-fields.
Main Results:
- E-field variability was mainly driven by scalp-normal displacement and rotation, with lateral movement having a lesser impact.
- The novel amplitude adjustment method significantly reduced target E-field variability.
- Within-session E-field variability decreased by 41% (from 2.85% to 1.67%), and across-session variability decreased by 74% (from 6.77% to 1.73%).
Conclusions:
- This study provides the first quantitative analysis of motion during rTMS treatment.
- A practical, low-computational-cost method for compensating motion-induced E-field variability was developed.
- The proposed approach is suitable for clinical implementation, improving rTMS treatment reliability, especially for patients prone to movement.
More Related Videos
09:30Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment
Published on: May 23, 2025
08:50Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: August 20, 2019