Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2012
Temporal Preparation and Executive Functions in the Context of a Variable Foreperiod Stop-Signal Paradigm in Macaque
Fatemeh Mohtashami Borzadaran1,2, Sadegh Ghasemian1,2, Elahe Rohani1,2
1Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
None:
The interaction between temporal preparation and response inhibition is poorly understood in primates. Across two experiments, we investigated this relationship in four rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) using a variable foreperiod (FP) stop-signal task, respectively focusing on effects of FP and its repetition/alteration across trials on response inhibition. We estimated ex-Gaussian distribution of reaction time in go trials (Go-RT) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) along with a probability of trigger failure (PTF). In the first experiment, increasing temporal preparation reduced the mean and variability of both the Gaussian and exponential components of Go-RT distribution, indicating generally faster and more consistent responding. In contrast, temporal preparation produced divergent effects on SSRT distribution: it numerically increased the Gaussian mean but decreased the exponential tail and overall variability. At the same time, PTF increased from short to long FP, suggesting that temporal preparation hinders the trigger of inhibition while enhancing its efficacy once triggered. In the second experiment, we found that FP effects on Go-RT distribution were largely independent of FP sequence. By contrast, response inhibition in the Gaussian component and entire distribution was modulated by FP switching: alternation between FPs prolonged inhibition latency. Also, FP switching reduced trigger failure, indicating a sequential adjustment that improved cue detection and reliability of stopping. Together, these findings demonstrate that temporal preparation shapes response execution primarily independent of state of preparation in the preceding trial, whereas its influence on response inhibition reflects short-term influences from the preceding trial.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Basic Continuous Time Signals
The unit step function, denoted u(t), is zero for negative time values and one for positive time values, exhibiting a discontinuity at t=0. This function often represents abrupt changes, such as the step voltage introduced when turning a car's...
Basic Operations on Signals
Time Reversal mirrors a continuous-time signal about the vertical axis at t=0. This is achieved by substituting t with −t. For example, if a signal x(t) is considered, the time-reversed signal is x(−t). This operation can be graphically represented, showing the mirrored signal.
BIBO stability of continuous and discrete -time systems
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system.
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
Parallel Processing
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

