Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Diagnostic Performance and Interpreter Experience of 1-Hour Versus 3-Hour 99mTc-HMDP Cardiac Amyloid Radionuclide
Gregorio Tersalvi1, Patricia Carey2, Armin Garmany3
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (G.T., H.J., M.G.R.-P., J.W.A., J.P.B., K.A.Y., N.S.A., M.G., P. Chareonthaitawee, O.F.A.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Background:
Guidelines recommend 3-hour cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging (CARI) for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Citing rapid blood clearance of 99mTc-hydroxymethylene-diphosphonate (HMDP) and efficient laboratory throughput, 1-hour imaging is increasingly practiced despite limited supporting evidence. We sought to compare diagnostic performance and interpreter experience of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI.
Methods:
Consecutive patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (n=114) underwent both 1-hour and 3-hour HMDP single photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT. Two cardiologist-radiologist reader teams, blinded to imaging timepoint (1 versus 3 hours), assessed overall interpretation, single photon emission CT-based Perugini grade, interpretation difficulty, interpreter confidence, and need for CT-fused images for anatomic localization. Discordant, equivocal, and difficult cases were arbitrated by a third tie-breaking team. The myocardial-to-blood-pool radiotracer uptake ratio (3-dimensional Score) was measured as a surrogate of contrast resolution.
Results:
Interinterpreter agreement was high at both time points (κ≥0.81), with more cases requiring arbitration at 3 hours versus 1 hour (22% versus 13%; P=0.049). Overall interpretation and Perugini grades were concordant between time points in 111/114 (97%) and 106/114 (93%) patients, respectively. Three patients (3%) were negative at 1 hour but equivocal at 3 hours, all of which were clinically ruled out for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Interpreter confidence was comparable at both timepoints (97% versus 95%; P=0.317). Compared with 3-hour imaging, contrast resolution was inferior (lower 3-dimensional score, P<0.001) and CT fusion was more frequently needed (57% versus 31%, P<0.001) at 1-hour imaging.
Conclusions:
In a prospective, blinded comparison of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI, diagnostic performance and interpreter experience were similar, with readers requesting CT fusion more frequently at 1 hour to optimize myocardial-to-blood pool discrimination.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

