Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Topical Airway Anesthesia for Awake-endoscopic Intubation Using the Spray-as-you-go Technique with High Oxygen Flow
Published on: January 13, 2017
Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam versus Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Awake Endotracheal Intubation for
Li Tang1, Mei Zhang2, Jinxin Guo1
1Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Objective:
To compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam in awake endotracheal intubation by flexible bronchoscopy for patients with difficult airways.
Methods:
Ninety patients with difficult airways undergoing elective surgical procedures requiring awake endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to three groups, with 30 patients per group: Group M (midazolam), which received a 0.04 mg/kg intravenous (IV) bolus; Group D (dexmedetomidine), which was given via intravenous infusion pump at a rate of 1.0 µg/kg/min for 10 minutes; and Group R (remimazolam), which received a 0.15 mg/kg IV bolus. All patients first received 0.1μg/kg of sufentanil intravenously for basic analgesia. A 2-minute interval was allowed to ensure initial onset of the analgesic effect, followed by administration of the respective sedative agents for each group as detailed above. Upon achieving a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score of≤2, pharyngeal topical anesthesia was administered, followed by flexible fiberoptic endotracheal intubation. The primary outcome measure was the first-attempt intubation success rate. All other evaluated parameters were defined as secondary outcomes. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded at four time points: baseline (T0), immediately before intubation (T1), immediately after intubation (T2), and 3 minutes post-intubation (T3). Additional outcomes assessed included the duration of anesthetic induction, the interval from induction to intubation, patient comfort levels, post-induction MOAA/S scores, and the incidence of adverse events.
Results:
The first-attempt intubation success rates across the three groups were 70%, 93.3%, and 100%, respectively. Compared with the values at T1, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were significantly higher in Group M at T2 and T3 (both P<0.05). In Group D, HR at T1 was significantly lower than that at T0 (P<0.05). For inter-group comparisons, HR in Group D was significantly lower than in Group R at T1 (P<0.05). Additionally, Group D had the longest duration of anesthetic induction and the longest interval from induction to intubation (both P<0.05). Compared with Group M, both Group D and Group R exhibited significantly higher first-attempt intubation success rates (P<0.05). Group R achieved the highest patient comfort scores, the highest success rate of sedation after a single induction dose, and the lowest incidence of adverse events (all P<0.05).
Conclusion:
Remimazolam provides effective sedation for awake tracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways. It exerts minimal impact on respiratory and circulatory function, is associated with fewer adverse events, and yields a higher intubation success rate, making it a favorable option for this patient population.
Insights
Remimazolam demonstrated superior efficacy and safety for awake tracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways compared to dexmedetomidine and midazolam. This sedative offers a favorable option due to its high success rate and minimal adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Awake endotracheal intubation is crucial for patients with difficult airways.
- Sedative selection impacts intubation success and patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam for awake endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways.
Main Methods:
- Ninety patients were randomized into three groups: midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and remimazolam.
- The primary outcome was the first-attempt intubation success rate.
- Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability, patient comfort, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- Remimazolam achieved a 100% first-attempt intubation success rate, significantly higher than midazolam (70%) and dexmedetomidine (93.3%).
- Remimazolam showed minimal impact on heart rate and mean arterial pressure, with fewer adverse events.
- Dexmedetomidine resulted in longer induction and intubation intervals and lower heart rate.
Conclusions:
- Remimazolam is an effective and safe sedative for awake tracheal intubation in difficult airways.
- It offers advantages in terms of success rate, hemodynamic stability, and tolerability.
- Remimazolam presents a favorable option for this patient population.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques

