Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

06:36
A Novel Tenorrhaphy Suture Technique with Tissue Engineered Collagen Graft to Repair Large Tendon Defects
Published on: December 10, 2021
3.3K
Differences in the Outcomes of Early Active Mobilization Following Flexor Tendon Repair Between Zone 1 and Distal
Koji Moriya1, Yutaka Maki1, Hisao Koda1
1Niigata Hand Surgery Foundation, Niigata, Japan.
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
|December 8, 2025
Summary
Flexor tendon repair with A4 pulley release showed similar finger joint motion for zone 1 and 2A injuries. However, zone 1 injuries had greater extension deficits and reduced distal interphalangeal joint motion.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Hand Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Complete A4 pulley release aids flexor tendon repair and excursion.
- Optimal repair levels for flexor digitorum profundus injuries with A4 pulley release remain unclear.
- Early active mobilization is crucial for functional recovery after tendon repair.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare active range of motion in finger joints after flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair at zone 1 versus zone 2A.
- To evaluate outcomes of zone 1 and zone 2A flexor tendon injuries treated with a six-strand suture and complete A4 pulley release.
- To assess the impact of injury level on functional recovery following early active mobilization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case series of 27 fingers (22 patients) with zone 1 (13) or zone 2A (14) flexor digitorum profundus injuries.
- All tendons repaired using a six-strand suture (Yoshizu #1 technique) with complete A4 pulley release.
- Early active mobilization initiated within three weeks post-surgery, with an average follow-up of 7 months.
Main Results:
- No tendon bowstringing observed.
- One rupture of a zone 1 flexor tendon repair occurred 8 weeks post-surgery.
- Excluding the rupture, no significant differences in overall active range of motion between zone 1 and 2A injuries were found.
- Zone 1 injuries showed significantly reduced distal interphalangeal joint motion and increased total extension deficit compared to zone 2A.
Conclusions:
- Despite consistent surgical technique and rehabilitation, zone 1 flexor tendon injuries resulted in poorer distal interphalangeal joint motion and greater extension deficits compared to zone 2A injuries.
- Complete A4 pulley release and early mobilization may not fully restore distal interphalangeal joint function in zone 1 injuries.
- Further investigation is needed to optimize outcomes for zone 1 flexor tendon repairs.

