Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.4K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.4K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.4K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

2.9K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
2.9K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.4K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accurate Crystal Field Hamiltonians of Single-Ion Magnets at Mean-Field Cost.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2025
Same author

Electron Sextets as Optically Addressable Molecular Qubits: Triplet Carbenes.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025
Same author

Discovery of Spin-Crossover Materials with Equivariant Graph Neural Networks and Relevance-Based Classification.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Magnetic and Thermodynamic Computations for Supramolecular Assemblies between a Cr(III) and Fe(III) Single-Ion Magnet and an Fe(II) Spin-Crossover Complex.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2024
Same author

Magnetoelectric Coupling in a Mn<sub>4</sub>Na-Organic Complex under Pulsed Magnetic Fields up to 73 T.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2024
Same author

Engineering Clock Transitions in Molecular Lanthanide Complexes.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.6K

Simulating decoherence of two coupled spins using the generalized cluster correlation expansion.

Xiao Chen1, Silas Hoffman2, James N Fry1

  • 1Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|December 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary

We simulated electron spin coherence in magnetic molecules, finding optimal conditions to maximize quantum gate performance by minimizing nuclear-induced dephasing. This research identifies key parameters for preserving electron spin coherence.

More Related Videos

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.9K
Confocal Microscopy Reveals Cell Surface Receptor Aggregation Through Image Correlation Spectroscopy
06:51

Confocal Microscopy Reveals Cell Surface Receptor Aggregation Through Image Correlation Spectroscopy

Published on: August 2, 2018

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.6K
A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.9K
Confocal Microscopy Reveals Cell Surface Receptor Aggregation Through Image Correlation Spectroscopy
06:51

Confocal Microscopy Reveals Cell Surface Receptor Aggregation Through Image Correlation Spectroscopy

Published on: August 2, 2018

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Science
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Quantum Computing

Background:

  • Coupled electron spins are fundamental to quantum computing architectures.
  • Nuclear spins can induce dephasing, limiting quantum gate fidelity.
  • Understanding decoherence mechanisms is crucial for robust quantum computation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the coherence of two coupled electron spins interacting with a nuclear bath.
  • To identify system parameters that minimize nuclear-induced dephasing and maximize coherence times.
  • To provide a physical understanding of optimal regimes for electron spin coherence.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the generalized cluster correlation expansion (GCCE) method for simulating spin dynamics.
  • Characterized the decoherence by analyzing T2 and T2* relaxation times of the two-electron reduced density matrix.
  • Systematically varied parameters including magnetic field, exchange interaction, spin-spin distance, and nuclear properties.

Main Results:

  • Identified specific parameter regimes that significantly enhance electron spin coherence.
  • Demonstrated that nuclear-induced dephasing is a primary limitation for entangling gates.
  • Quantified the impact of magnetic field strength and orientation, exchange interaction, and nuclear density on coherence.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal configurations exist for maximizing electron spin coherence in realistic molecular systems.
  • The findings provide guidance for designing quantum gates with improved fidelity in solid-state qubits.
  • This work contributes to the development of scalable and robust quantum computing technologies.