Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Determining Viral Disinfection Efficacy of Hot Water Laundering
Published on: June 21, 2022
Hydrogen peroxide fogging of isolation gowns: Disinfection efficacy and VOC emissions
Shay Iyer1, Zenhwa Ouyang2, Arathi Vinayak1
1Department of Surgical Oncology, VCA West Coast Specialty and Emergency Animal Hospital, Fountain Valley, California, United States of America.
Abstract:
Isolation gowns constitute the majority of the PPE waste generated daily worldwide. Disinfection with reuse that is easily reproducible without the need for expensive equipment or trained personnel is needed. This study evaluated the use of 9% hydrogen peroxide fogging using a commercially available fogger on isolation gowns heavily inoculated in the torso region of the gown with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli to challenge efficacy. Cultures were obtained on isolation gowns immediately after inoculation from both the interior as well as the exterior of the gowns before disinfection. Gowns were then fogged with 9% hydrogen peroxide (HP) for 1 min and 30sec. A four-hour trying time was instituted, and gowns were cultured from the torso region again. All cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 72 hours. CFU at 48- and 72-hours post-incubation were obtained. Safety of this methodology was studied by evaluating Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) as a VOC index (1-500) as well as in parts per million (PPM) generated during HP fogging of gowns, aiming to determine whether the use of vacuum-aeration (VA) led to an improvement in VOCs generated. Results indicate that fogging with HP was effective at reducing S. epidermidis and E. coli as measured by CFU (100% reduction at 72 hours for both organisms). VOC index and PPM were greater without VA than with VA. The maximum Δ(IndexBC) (191) and Δ (PPMBC) (0.301) occurred at 90 minutes and then fell to between 156 and 187 for Δ (IndexBC) and 0.202 and 0.253 for Δ (PPMBC). This corresponded to 82% (156/191) and 98% (187/191) of the maximum VOC index and 67% (0.202/0.301) and 84% (0.253/0.301) of the maximum PPM without VA. Our results indicate that HP fogging may be a viable option for disinfection and reuse of single use isolation gowns and VA may be a valuable additional step in improving air quality during the process.
More Related Videos
14:17The Portable Chemical Sterilizer PCS, D-FENS, and D-FEND ALL: Novel Chlorine Dioxide Decontamination Technologies for the Military
Published on: June 29, 2014
09:30Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control