Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

A Tuberculosis Molecular Bacterial Load Assay TB-MBLA
Published on: April 30, 2020
TB LAMP- a potential way forward to diagnose smear negative suspected TB cases
Bharat Kumawat1, Man Mohan Puri1, Manpreet Bhalla2
1Department TB and Respiratory Diseases, National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi, India.
Objective:
Mycobacterium tuberculosis has co-existed with humans for millennia. Even after century from its discovery, TB is currently one of the major health problems globally, especially in developing nations. Tuberculosis diagnostics poses the biggest challenge particularly in peripheral settings in TB endemic countries. Smear microscopy still remains the method of choice for identifying TB; however the need of the hour calls for replacement of this technique, by a rapid diagnostic tool with higher sensitivity and specificity. TB LAMP was approved by WHO in 2016, as substitute for smear microscopy. However more data is required, especially for smear negative suspected TB patients, before its deployment into field setting.
Study Design:
A total of 51 smear negative suspected TB patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were clinically/radiological diagnosed with TB. Microbiological confirmation in terms of culture and NAAT based diagnosis by Xpert MTB/RIF and TB LAMP was performed for all the patients.
Results:
TB LAMP was found to be positive in 74.50 % samples. The sensitivity of TB LAMP and Xpert MTB/RIF, using culture as reference standard, was found to be 84.85 % (95 %CI: 68.10-94.89 %) and 82.35 % (95CI: 65.47-93.24 %) respectively. The specificity of TB LAMP and Xpert MTB/RIF, using culture as reference standard, was found to be 47.06 % (95 %CI: 22.98-72.19 %) and 41.1 (95CI: 18.44-67.08 %) respectively. The PPV and NPV of TB LAMP was 40.72 % (95 %CI: 30.02-52.38 %) and 87.87 % (95 %CI: 73.67-94.94 %) respectively.
Conclusion:
We observed similar sensitivity and specificity of TB LAMP and Xpert MIB/RIF for smear negative suspected TB patients. TB LAMP was also able to detect M.tb in 5 % of smear negative, culture negative samples as well. These results indicate that TB LAMP could be a promising candidate of rapid detection of TB in otherwise 'hidden TB' cases. However, further validation is required, before TB LAMP can be introduced to mainstream TB elimination program.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Sputum Studies I: Gram Stain, cytology, and Acid-fast smear and culture
Gram Stain
The Gram Stain is an integral part of sputum studies. It involves the staining of sputum, which permits...

