Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distributed Loads01:19

Distributed Loads

927
Distributed loads are a common type of load that engineers and scientists encounter in various practical situations. Distributed loads often refer to a type of load spread over a surface or a structure and can be modeled as continuous force per unit area.
For example, consider a bookshelf filled with books stacked vertically adjacent to each other. The weight of the books is evenly distributed over the length of the shelf. As a result, the pressure at different locations on the surface of the...
927
Distributed Loads: Problem Solving01:21

Distributed Loads: Problem Solving

1.1K
Beams are structural elements commonly employed in engineering applications requiring different load-carrying capacities. The first step in analyzing a beam under a distributed load is to simplify the problem by dividing the load into smaller regions, which allows one to consider each region separately and calculate the magnitude of the equivalent resultant load acting on each portion of the beam. The magnitude of the equivalent resultant load for each region can be determined by calculating...
1.1K
Energy and Power Signals01:17

Energy and Power Signals

1.0K
In an electrical system with a resistor, voltage and current signals facilitate the measurement of power and energy across the resistor. For a continuous-time signal, the total energy over a time interval is defined as the integral of the square of the signal's magnitude over that interval. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
1.0K
Transient and Steady-state Response01:24

Transient and Steady-state Response

500
In control systems, test signals are essential for evaluating performance under various conditions. The ramp function is effective for systems undergoing gradual changes, while the step function is suitable for assessing systems facing sudden disturbances. For systems subjected to shock inputs, the impulse function is the most appropriate test signal.
These test signals are integral in designing control systems to exhibit two key performance aspects: transient response and steady-state...
500
Maximum Power Flow and Line Loadability01:23

Maximum Power Flow and Line Loadability

576
The maximum power flow for lossy transmission lines is derived using ABCD parameters in phasor form. These parameters create a matrix relationship between the sending-end and receiving-end voltages and currents, allowing the determination of the receiving-end current. This relationship facilitates calculating the complex power delivered to the receiving end, from which real and reactive power components are derived.
576
Fast Decoupled and DC Powerflow01:24

Fast Decoupled and DC Powerflow

714
The fast decoupled power flow method addresses contingencies in power system operations, such as generator outages or transmission line failures. This method provides quick power flow solutions, essential for real-time system adjustments. Fast decoupled power flow algorithms simplify the Jacobian matrix by neglecting certain elements, leading to two sets of decoupled equations:
714

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multimodal dual-branch attention-centric YOLOv12 framework for real-time integrated pest and weed detection from UAV imagery in precision agriculture.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Pioneering detonation pressure in energetic materials.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Dynamical analysis and exact solitary wave solutions of [Formula: see text]-dimensional integro-differential Jaulent-Miodek equation using two analytical schemes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Miniaturized shared aperture multiband antenna for wireless biomedical applications.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence investigation of magneto radiated nanofluid under mixed convection.

Discover nano·2026
Same author

Soliton solutions for the nonlinear Zoomeron equation applying the modified Khater method.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

MT-MRI for detection of renal interstitial fibrosis in renovascular disease.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Detection of underground objects from GPR data using a lightweight YOLO-based approach.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Early systemic inflammatory-metabolic trajectory phenotypes are associated with survival outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Water balance components in a dry-seeded rice-wheat system: Untangling the effects of tillage and mulching practices.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Topological approaches to quantum tensor train compression via ZX-calculus and SVD.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

determinants of flood impacts and adaptive capacity among market vendors in Walukuba-Masese, Jinja city, Uganda.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Lightweight machine learning framework using temporal features for electric vehicle demand response forecasting on

Ali Mujtaba Durrani1, Azzam Ul Asar1, Abdul Aziz2

  • 1Department of Electrical Engineering, CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan.

Scientific Reports
|December 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Lightweight machine learning models effectively forecast electric vehicle (EV) charging loads and optimize demand response (DR) strategies, even in low-computation environments. XGBoost and Random Forest show the highest accuracy for EV energy management.

Keywords:
Demand responseElectric vehicle chargingEnergy efficiencyForecastingLoad shiftingMachine learningXgBoost

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Energy Management
  • Machine Learning
  • Electric Vehicles

Background:

  • Rising electric vehicle (EV) adoption presents significant challenges for grid energy management, particularly in resource-constrained settings.
  • Effective demand response (DR) strategies are crucial for balancing energy supply and demand with increasing EV integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate lightweight machine learning (ML) models for accurate EV charging load forecasting.
  • To optimize various demand response (DR) strategies using predicted EV load profiles.
  • To assess model performance in terms of prediction accuracy and computational efficiency for low-resource environments.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Kaggle dataset of time-series EV charging data, performing preprocessing, down-sampling, and feature engineering.
  • Implemented and compared five ML models: Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).
  • Evaluated seven DR strategies (Peak Clipping, Valley Filling, Load Shifting, Load Levelling, Strategic Load Growth, Strategic Conservation, Flexible Load Shape) using MAE, RMSE, and R² metrics.

Main Results:

  • XGBoost demonstrated the highest accuracy, achieving an R² score of 0.975 for Strategic Conservation and 0.943 for Valley Filling.
  • Random Forest also performed well, with an R² score of 0.91, indicating strong predictive capabilities.
  • Linear Regression and kNN models showed significantly lower performance, with R² values rarely exceeding 0.50 across most DR strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Lightweight ML models are capable of delivering high performance for EV load prediction and DR modeling.
  • These models offer scalable solutions for grid operators and policymakers in environments with limited computational resources.
  • The findings highlight the potential of optimized DR strategies powered by efficient ML for managing EV energy demand.