Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026
Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Diagnostic Performance of Onset Characterization vs. Time-to-Peak Assessment in Acute Abdominal Pain
Toshihiko Takada1, Ryuji Suzuki2, Hiroshi Honjo3
1Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching and Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, Shirakawa, Fukushima, Japan. ttakada@water.ocn.ne.jp.
Background:
Accurate assessment of symptom onset is crucial for diagnosing acute abdominal pain, particularly to identify life-threatening conditions such as rupture, dissection, vascular occlusion, torsion, or perforation. However, the optimal method for evaluating pain onset remains unclear.
Objective:
To compare the diagnostic performance of two history-taking approaches for evaluating pain onset: sudden onset characterization, which asks whether the pain began suddenly, and time-to-peak assessment, which asks how long it took for the pain to reach maximum intensity, considering "instantaneous peak" responses as positive.
Design:
Prospective diagnostic study at a single acute care hospital in Japan between December 2022 and October 2024.
Patients:
A consecutive sample of adult patients presenting with abdominal pain of 7 days' duration or less in the emergency department was assessed.
Main Measures:
The primary outcome was the presence of a target condition, defined as rupture, dissection, vascular occlusion, torsion, or perforation of an intra-abdominal organ, confirmed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography findings or clinical follow-up. Diagnostic measures including specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated for each approach.
Key Results:
Of the 629 patients (median age, 58 years [interquartile range (IQR), 44-72 years]; 48.5% male), 20 (3.2%) were diagnosed with a target condition. Specificity improved from 86.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.8%-89.2%) with sudden onset characterization to 94.3% (95% CI, 92.1%-95.8%) with time-to-peak assessment (P < .001). Sensitivity was 40.0% (95% CI, 21.9%-61.3%) for sudden onset characterization and 30.0% (95% CI, 14.5%-51.9%) for time-to-peak assessment (P = .48).
Conclusions:
Time-to-peak assessment demonstrated higher specificity without a significant loss of sensitivity compared with sudden onset characterization. This approach may assist in ruling-in critical intra-abdominal conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain. However, neither method alone is sufficient to rule-out life-threatening conditions.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
01:30Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
01:30Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
01:21Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
01:22Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
01:25Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....