Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Treatment with Vancomycin Loaded Calcium Sulphate and Autogenous Bone in an Improved Rabbit Model of Bone Infection
Published on: March 14, 2019
Long-term follow-up of implants placed after Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional autogenous bone grafts: a
H Persson1, C Östlund1, L Rasmusson1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Background:
Oral implantology has become a standard procedure for replacing missing teeth. However, patients with severe maxillary bone resorption often require complex surgical interventions, such as Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting, prior to implant placement. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of oral implants placed following this surgical technique.
Patients And Methods:
The present study was two-fold. First, a retrospective review was performed using medical records and conventional panoramic radiographs from 26 patients who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting and received either Astra Tech or Brånemark oral implants. Patients were followed for up to 5 years. Marginal bone loss was measured from the implant shoulder to the bone level. Implant survival and success rates were assessed, with success defined as bone loss of ≤ 2 mm during the first year and < 0.2 mm annually thereafter. Second, to assess the long-term outcomes of the two oral implant systems, all traceable patients were invited to undergo a follow-up radiographic examination up to 29 years post-treatment.
Results:
The combined survival rates for Astra Tech and Brånemark oral implants were 97.0%, 94.6%, and 94.1% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, with no additional implant loss observed by year 5. The overall success rate at 5 years was 56.1%, with Astra Tech implants showing a higher success rate (70.8%) compared to Brånemark implants (51.4%). Although there was no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two systems, Astra Tech implants demonstrated significantly less marginal bone loss at both 1-year (p < 0.01) and 3-year (p = 0.021) follow-ups. For the long-term evaluation, 14 patients (54%) from the original cohort were traceable, of whom 4 patients (29%) participated in the follow-up. Among the 28 Brånemark implants assessed, none were lost, resulting in a 100% survival rate up to 29 years. The mean marginal bone loss of 2.6 ± 1.8 mm.
Conclusion:
Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting, followed by oral implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation, appears to be a reliable long-term treatment option for patients with severe maxillary atrophy, demonstrating favorable long-term survival-, and success rates.
More Related Videos
07:41An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016
09:07Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
Published on: January 26, 2024