Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
Published on: May 10, 2016
Qualitative and quantitative in silico toxicity profiling of "angel dust": phencyclidine (PCP) analogues as new
Maciej Noga1, Kamil Jurowski2,3,4
1Department of Regulatory and Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Medical Expertises in Łódź, ul. Aleksandrowska 67/93, 91-205, Lodz, Poland.
Abstract:
Phencyclidine (PCP), historically known as "angel dust," and its analogues (3-HO-PCP, 3-MeO-PCP, 4-MeO-PCP, 3-HO-PCE, 3-MeO-PCE, 4-MeO-PCE) are dissociative new psychoactive substances with high abuse potential and limited experimental safety data. An integrated in silico workflow (STopTox, admetSAR 3.0, ADMETlab 3.0, ACD/Labs Percepta, Toxtree, ProTox 3.0, OCHEM, TEST, VEGA QSAR) was applied to profile acute toxicity and key hazard domains. Across platforms, rat oral LD50 values for PCP-type analogues were consistently in the ~ 200-630 mg/kg range (Percepta 210-800 mg/kg, TEST 197-628 mg/kg, VEGA 278-368 mg/kg, ProTox ~ 348-404 mg/kg), indicating moderate acute toxicity by the oral route; substantially lower LD50 values were predicted for intravenous exposure in mice (~ 25-59 mg/kg). Qualitative models (STopTox, ADMETlab, admetSAR) classified all compounds as acutely toxic by the oral route (e.g., STopTox oral toxicity confidence ~ 77-92%) and commonly predicted inhalation/dermal risks depending on the analogue; admetSAR assigned EPA Category III for acute oral toxicity. Organ-specific effects (Percepta; ADMETlab) highlighted the lungs, liver, and blood as prominent targets (e.g., lungs 0.89-0.93, liver up to 0.91, blood up to 0.85), with gastrointestinal involvement (up to 0.82) and generally lower kidney probabilities (~ 0.09-0.70). Cardiotoxicity signals included predicted hERG inhibition with Percepta IC50 ~ 4.9-12.3 µM and high probabilities of hERG blockade in ADMETlab/admetSAR, supporting potential QT-prolongation risk. Genotoxicity predictions were consistently negative across Percepta, OCHEM, ADMETlab, admetSAR, and VEGA. Eye/skin irritation potential was notable for phenolic analogues, with Percepta indicating high probabilities for 3-HO-PCP and 3-HO-PCE (eye ~ 88-90%, skin ~ 96%), while other tools showed model-dependent variability. Endocrine screening suggested at most weak-to-moderate ER-α interactions, with the highest probability for 3-HO-PCP (LogRBA > - 3). Overall, convergent multi-tool evidence indicates moderate acute toxicity, cardiotoxicity signals, and multi-organ risk for PCP analogues, while mutagenicity appears unlikely. These results provide mechanistic and quantitative context to inform clinical management, forensic interpretation, and risk assessment of this NPS class.
More Related Videos
09:01A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans
Published on: March 14, 2019
05:47In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
CNS Stimulants: Psychedelic Agents
Preclinical Development: Overview
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity