Surgery versus chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
Zu-Yi Chen1, Shou-Feng Wang2, Huan-Wei Liang3
1Department of Interventional Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
To compare survival outcomes between surgery and chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer. Stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer patients treated with either surgery or chemoradiotherapy were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2000 and 2020. Included patients were divided into two groups: surgery and chemoradiotherapy. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Among the 515 patients included in the study, 55 (10.7%) underwent chemoradiotherapy and 460 (89.3%) received surgery. Surgery showed better 5-year CSS (73.2% vs. 31.0%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.39; P < 0.001) and OS (60.0% vs. 21.5%; HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.25-0.48; P < 0.001) compared to chemoradiotherapy. Subgroup analysis indicated that surgery remained associated with superior 5-year CSS (61.3% vs. 40.6%; HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99; P = 0.049) and OS (48.9% vs. 23.8%; HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.91; P = 0.021) compared to chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma patients. Similarly, surgery showed better 5-year CSS (76.0% vs. 27.1%; HR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.14-0.34; P < 0.001) and OS (62.7% vs. 20.6%; HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.46; P < 0.001) compared to chemoradiotherapy in adenocarcinoma patients. Surgery is associated with superior survival outcomes compared to chemoradiotherapy in stage T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer and should be considered the preferred treatment for eligible patients, particularly in settings where consistent follow-up and salvage therapy may be limited.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
09:04Low-Cost Single-Port LoCoSP Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
