Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Combining Analysis of DNA in a Crude Virion Extraction with the Analysis of RNA from Infected Leaves to Discover New Virus Genomes
Published on: July 27, 2018
Asynchronous Viral Spread of Two Unrelated Viruses Determines Lettuce Big Vein Disease Symptom Development
Willem E W Schravesande1,2, Peter M de Heer2, Maurice Heilijgers2
1Molecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences (SILS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098XH, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
Lettuce big-vein disease (LBVD) is a major disease affecting lettuce cultivation worldwide. LBVD is caused by two unrelated negative-stranded RNA viruses, Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus (MiLBVV; Ophiovirus mirafioriense; Aspiviridae) and lettuce big-vein associated virus (LBVaV; Varicosavirus lactucae; Rhabdoviridae), both vectored by the soilborne fungus Olpidium virulentus. Despite extensive research, a synergistic effect between the two viruses has not been observed, whereas both viruses individually have been suggested to be the causal agent for the disease. By performing lettuce reinfections using a large soil sample collection carrying LBVD-infested O. virulentus spores, the presence of LBVaV was consistently established in diseased lettuce heads, whereas MiLBVV infections were apparently less prevalent. However, aboveground infections with MiLBVV corresponded with strong disease symptoms. Strikingly, the spread of LBVaV from the root to shoot always preceded that of MiLBVV. The LBVaV systemic spread was highly synchronized between plants, whereas MiLBVV spread was always delayed and asynchronous. A pangenome analysis revealed independent segment reassortments for both viruses, indicative of mixed field infections over the sampled period. However, RNA segment abundance was highly conserved for both viruses between all reinfections, suggesting that segment abundance has a regulatory role for the two individual viruses but is not impacted by the presence of the other two viruses. The pangenome analysis also revealed different evolutionary rates of the viral open reading frames, suggesting that mutagenesis of certain open reading frames compromises viral fitness and thus revealing a potential weak spot for both viruses.
More Related Videos
11:12Protocols for Investigating the Host-tissue Distribution, Transmission-mode, and Effect on the Host Fitness of a Densovirus in the Cotton Bollworm
Published on: April 12, 2017
06:01Testing the Physiological Barriers to Viral Transmission in Aphids Using Microinjection
Published on: May 14, 2008
Related Concept Videos
Viral Recombination
Subviral Agents
Mechanisms of Retrovirus-induced Cancers
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...