White matter hyperintensity regression: Fact or artifact?

Ahmed A Bahrani1, Peter T Nelson2, Erin L Abner3

  • 1Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Neurobiology of Aging
|December 9, 2025
PubMed

Insights

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) can decrease in volume, suggesting brain recovery. This review confirms WMH regression is a real biological process, not just an artifact, potentially influenced by treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are key MRI biomarkers linked to aging and dementia.
  • While WMH volume typically increases, spontaneous regression suggests active brain repair mechanisms.
  • The biological reality of WMH regression versus imaging artifacts remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence on white matter hyperintensity (WMH) regression.
  • To analyze methods for detecting and quantifying WMH regression.
  • To explore proposed biological mechanisms underlying WMH regression.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Analysis of 174 articles, focusing on 31 directly addressing WMH regression.
  • Evaluation of technical factors and measurement protocols in WMH quantification.

Main Results:

  • Identified 26 original studies and 5 case reports on WMH regression.
  • Highlighted technical factors (scan parameters, motion, intervals) influencing measurements.
  • Found strong evidence supporting WMH regression as a robust biological phenomenon.

Conclusions:

  • WMH regression is a biologically significant process, not solely an artifact.
  • Standardized measurement protocols are crucial for accurate assessment.
  • WMH regression may be modulated by clinical interventions, warranting further research.