Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Mixed methodology: A pragmatic approach to investigating complexity in radiography research
J Nightingale1, A Stewart-Lord2
1Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, UK.
Objectives:
Mixed methodology research designs are used to investigate and evaluate complexity in healthcare, yet the integration or mixing of qualitative and quantitative data in these studies is still considered a major methodological challenge. This article is the first to review the utilisation of mixed methods studies in radiography, with a particular emphasis on research design and evidence of integration. The paper presents a contemporary case study to explore advanced framework integration and concludes with recommendations for radiography mixed methods researchers.
Key Findings:
A search of three radiography journals (2013-2025) identified 26 mixed methods studies, mainly focusing on workforce research questions. At design level, only 14 studies were explicit about integration. Most studies were two-phase designs, with five studies deploying advanced frameworks. Convergent and explanatory sequential designs were prevalent, with data collection primarily through surveys, interviews and focus groups. Integration at the methods and reporting levels was rarely documented. The majority adopted a narrative integration reporting style, though few explicitly discussed qualitative and quantitative findings together. Only three articles explicitly defined meta-inferences, the new insights that emerge from the mixing of qualitative and quantitative data.
Conclusion:
The adoption of mixed methodologies in radiography is limited but is increasingly used to investigate complex workforce research questions. While the individual quantitative and qualitative components are invariably well-described, a lack of meaningful integration potentially compromises the attainment of the true benefits of a mixed methods design.
Implications For Practice:
At the onset of the study, researchers are advised to justify the mixed methods design, clearly articulating the methods of integration at all study stages. Researchers should utilise appropriate tools that encourage reporting of quality criteria to ensure trustworthiness.
More Related Videos
08:33A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
02:09Multi-modal Pulmonary Imaging: Using Complementary Information from CT and Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI to Evaluate Lung Structure-Function
Published on: April 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Archival Research
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...