Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
From innovation to practice: factors influencing implementation of the PAROLE-Onco peer support program
Yaël Busnel1,2, Férima Sanogo2,3, Monica Iliescu Nelea4,2
1Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, University Lyon 1, Lyon, F-69000, France.
Background:
The PAROLE-Onco program, implemented in Quebec, integrates peer support (accompanying patients (APs)) into clinical oncology teams, to support cancer patients during their health trajectory. Despite the growing evidence of its benefits, scaling up this program across various healthcare settings presents significant challenges. The aim of the study is to explore healthcare professionals/managers' perceptions of the factors influencing the implementation and expansion of the PAROLE-Onco program.
Methods:
A multiple-case case study approach was employed, collecting data from various stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, managers, and research team members, through semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Practice Change Model (PCM) were used to analyze barriers and facilitators to program implementation.
Results:
A total of 26 healthcare professionals/managers responded to the online survey, providing insights into the challenges and opportunities related to the integration of APs. The study identified key external, organizational, and individual factors affecting implementation. Outer setting factors, such as a supportive policy environment and sustainable funding, were essential but not sufficient on their own. Organizational challenges, including limited space, siloed structures, and the need for a strong culture of patient partnership, were significant barriers. At the individual level, factors like leadership commitment, openness to the program, and staff knowledge of the AP's role were crucial to successful implementation. Common barriers included time constraints, work overload, and resistance to change, while facilitators were engaged leadership, communication strategies, and role clarity for APs.
Conclusions:
The findings highlight the importance of multi-level factors, including leadership support, adequate resources, and staff engagement, in scaling up the PAROLE-Onco program. Successful implementation requires a tailored approach that considers the unique challenges of each healthcare setting. These insights can guide future efforts to optimize peer support programs in oncology and other healthcare areas, aiming for better patient care and outcomes.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Elements Crucial for Effective Psychotherapy
The Therapeutic Alliance
The therapeutic alliance refers to the relationship between the therapist and the client. The alliance strengthens when the therapist and the client engage in a nurturing, supportive, trusting, empathetic, and respectful relationship, improving therapeutic outcomes. Therapists must monitor this relationship...
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia