Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Abnormal Flagging of Prostate Specific Antigen Screening Tests: A Regression Discontinuity Design.
Patrick Lewicki1, Ralph Jiang2, Archana Radhakrishnan3
1Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. lewickip@med.umich.edu.
Abnormal flagging of prostate specific antigen (PSA) results significantly increases repeat testing, urology referrals, and biopsies. This suggests current reporting may lead to inappropriate prostate cancer evaluations, highlighting a need for improved standards.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Public Health
Background:
- Prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing lacks defined normal/abnormal levels.
- The "upper limit of normal" (ULN) is a common but limited guideline for interpreting PSA results.
- Physicians' reliance on "abnormal flagging" may drive care irrespective of individual patient risk factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of "abnormal flagging" of PSA results above the ULN on subsequent diagnostic pathways.
- To determine if flagging influences repeat PSA testing, urology referrals, and prostate biopsies or MRIs.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a regression discontinuity design on a cohort of 38,042 PSA screening tests.
- Analyzed the association between "abnormal" PSA flagging and downstream medical interventions.
- Adjusted for patient age and PSA level differences.
Main Results:
- 2.7% of PSA tests were flagged as abnormal.
- "Abnormal" flagging significantly increased the odds of repeat PSA testing (OR 14.17), urology referral (OR 10.03), and prostate MRI or biopsy (OR 13.61).
- These associations remained significant after adjusting for covariates.
Conclusions:
- Abnormal flagging of PSA results above the ULN strongly influences clinical decision-making.
- This practice may lead to both over- and under-evaluation of prostate cancer risk.
- Recommends developing improved reporting standards that incorporate patient-specific risk estimates.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
07:34Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
Published on: November 17, 2023