Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve
Ahmed Nazmy1,2, Ahmed Sobhy1,2, Ahmed Elshahat1,3
1Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Negida Academy, Arlington, Massachusetts, USA.
Insights
Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) do not reduce stroke risk after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This systematic review found no significant benefit for CEPDs in preventing stroke or improving neurocognitive outcomes post-TAVI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Neurology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Stroke is a significant complication following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
- Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) are designed to reduce stroke risk during TAVI.
- The clinical effectiveness of CEPDs in mitigating stroke and improving neurocognitive outcomes post-TAVI remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the impact of CEPDs on stroke risk and neurocognitive outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.
- To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CEPD use versus no CEPD during TAVI.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL until May 2025.
- Inclusion of nine RCTs involving 11,696 adult patients undergoing TAVI.
- Primary endpoint: incidence of all-cause stroke; secondary endpoints: disabling stroke, TIA, MACCE, systemic bleeding, and neurological assessments (MoCA, NIHSS, new ischemic lesions).
Main Results:
- CEPD use did not show a statistically significant reduction in all-cause stroke compared to the control group (OR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.73-1.15], p = 0.44).
- No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, including disabling stroke, MACCE, systemic bleeding, or neurological outcomes like MoCA score decline or new ischemic lesions.
Conclusions:
- The current evidence suggests that CEPDs do not provide a significant benefit in reducing the risk of all-cause stroke after TAVI.
- CEPDs did not demonstrate improvements in other assessed clinical or neurocognitive outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.
Abstract:
Stroke remains one of the most devastating complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged to mitigate patients' risks, their impact on stroke risk, as well as other clinical and neurocognitive outcomes after TAVI, remains uncertain. We aimed to assess whether CEPDs alleviate stroke risks and neurocognitive outcomes after TAVI. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until May 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effectiveness of CEPD compared to the control group (no CEPD) in adult patients (> 18 years) undergoing TAVI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of all-cause stroke. In contrast, the secondary endpoints included disabling stroke, systemic bleeding, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Additionally, we assessed neurological outcomes, including changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and the presence of new ischemic lesions. Nine RCTs comprising 11,696 patients were included in the final analysis. The use of CEPDs showed no statistical difference in reducing all-cause stroke compared to the control group (OR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.73-1.15], p = 0.44). Additionally, there was no significant difference in other studies' secondary outcomes, including disabling stroke, MACCE, systemic bleeding, or neurological outcomes, such as worsening NISSS, decline in MoCA score, and the presence of new ischemic lesions. The use of CEPD during TAVI showed no benefit in reducing the risks of all-cause stroke and other neurological outcomes studied.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

