Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
Published on: January 19, 2024
Reduced perceptual span in dyslexic children: a gaze-contingent eye-tracking study
Antonin Rossier-Bisaillon1, Julie Robidoux1, Brigitte Stanké2
1École d'orthophonie et d'audiologie de l'Université de Montréal, 7077, avenue du Parc, Montréal H3N 1X7, Canada; Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), 6363, chemin Hudson, Montréal H3S 1M9, Canada; Institut Universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal (IURDPM), 2275, avenue Laurier Est, Montréal H2H 2N8, Canada; Laboratoire de Recherche en Neurosciences et Électrophysiologie Cognitive, Recherche CIUSSS-NÎM, Hôpital en santé mentale Rivière des Prairies, 7070, boulevard Perras, Montréal H1E 1A4, Canada.
Introduction:
In typically developing 9-year-olds, the perceptual span-the region of text from which useful information is extracted during a single eye fixation-extends up to seven characters to the right of fixation. This parafoveal preview supports fluent reading by facilitating saccade planning and lexical preprocessing. However, the perceptual span in children with dyslexia remains undocumented, and findings in adults are inconsistent. While theoretical models suggest a reduced span in dyslexia, this study offers the first experimental test of this hypothesis in children.
Methods:
14 dyslexic children aged 9- to 12-year-old and 24 age-matched controls participated in the present eye-tracking study. Using a gaze-contingent window paradigm, children read sentences aloud while the number of visible characters around the point of fixation was systematically manipulated. Reading speed, reading accuracy, fixation duration and saccade length were assessed across five window size conditions.
Results:
Our results show a diminished impact of window sizes on the reading speed of children with dyslexia as compared to controls. Eye-tracking data confirmed an increased foveal load and reduced parafoveal processing for this group. In both groups, gaze-contingent windows did not impact reading accuracy.
Conclusion:
Results are interpreted within the framework of the foveal load hypothesis, alongside prior evidence of reduced preview benefit and heightened visual crowding in dyslexia. In this view, the greater effort required for foveal word identification in dyslexic readers limits the attentional resources available for parafoveal processing, thereby constraining access to upcoming text and ultimately reducing the effective perceptual span during reading.
More Related Videos
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
05:54Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
Published on: October 18, 2018