Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.5K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.5K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.5K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

42.8K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
42.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A bio-inspired research paradigm of collision perception neurons enabling neuro-robotic integration: the LGMD case.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

A Computationally Efficient Neuronal Model for Collision Detection with Contrast Polarity-Specific Feed-Forward Inhibition.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

A Bio-Inspired Probabilistic Neural Network Model for Noise-Resistant Collision Perception.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Modelling Drosophila motion vision pathways for decoding the direction of translating objects against cluttered moving backgrounds.

Biological cybernetics·2020
Same journal

A bio-inspired, soft-bodied jumper.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2026
Same journal

Structural and Functional Characteristics of the Exoskeletal Architecture of the Cuttlebone.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2026
Same journal

Design, Kinematic Modeling and Aerodynamic Performance Evaluation of a Beetle-Inspired Folding Wing with High Folding Ratio.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Feedback Control Improves Peristaltic Turning in Confined Environments.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2026
Same journal

Design of an Inchworm-Inspired Crawling Robot Based on Dielectric Elastomers.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2026
Same journal

Landing-Induced Viscoelastic Changes in an Anthropomimetic Foot Joint Structure are Modulated by Foot Structure and Posture.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Using Looming Visual Stimuli to Evaluate Mouse Vision
05:07

Using Looming Visual Stimuli to Evaluate Mouse Vision

Published on: June 13, 2019

12.1K

Stochastic and evolutionary looming detection under visual noise.

Yizuo Cai1, Qinbing Fu1

  • 1Machine Life and Intelligence Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, People's Republic of China.

Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
|December 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study enhanced neural models for visual collision detection by integrating probabilistic modeling, significantly improving robustness against visual noise. Introducing probability, regardless of distribution type, boosts performance in challenging environments.

Keywords:
biological randomnessevolutionary computationlooming detectionneural modelingprobabilistic model

More Related Videos

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy
08:25

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy

Published on: April 27, 2021

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Using Looming Visual Stimuli to Evaluate Mouse Vision
05:07

Using Looming Visual Stimuli to Evaluate Mouse Vision

Published on: June 13, 2019

12.1K
Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy
08:25

Continuous Measurement of Biological Noise in Escherichia Coli Using Time-lapse Microscopy

Published on: April 27, 2021

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Locust lobula giant movement detectors (LGMD) offer efficient visual collision detection but struggle in noisy conditions.
  • Biological synaptic randomness suggests probabilistic models can improve robustness against noise.
  • Prior work showed Bernoulli distribution enhances LGMD models in noise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate optimal probability distributions for enhancing LGMD model performance in looming detection.
  • To integrate Gaussian-distribution probability into an LGMD neural network with ON/OFF-contrast channels.
  • To evaluate the model's robustness in diverse and noisy visual scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Integrated Gaussian-distribution probability into an LGMD neural network model.
  • Employed evolutionary computation for parameter searching across day/night scenarios.
  • Tested model performance in realistic and artificially noisy environments.

Main Results:

  • Achieved an 83% improvement in the distinct ratio, quantifying enhanced sensitivity to noisy signals.
  • Demonstrated superior robustness compared to previous methods in noisy conditions.
  • Found that probability introduction enhances performance, with distribution type being less critical.

Conclusions:

  • Stochastic signal processing effectively simulates neuronal uncertainty and modulates signal strength.
  • Probabilistic modeling significantly enhances LGMD model robustness for looming detection.
  • The dual functionality of probabilistic processing balances neural computation for improved performance.