Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

44.4K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
44.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DNA-Mimic Antirestriction Proteins ArdA Could Regulate Gene Expression in <i>Escherichia coli</i>.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Analysis of a Novel T1-like Phage KanT1 Reveals a Standalone SH3 Domain as a Widespread Component of <i>Drexlerviridae</i> Cell Lysis Module.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Dynamics of phage-host interactions in Bacteroides fragilis resolved by single-cell transcriptomics.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Efficient recovery and DNA extraction for algae-associated microbial communities.

Frontiers in plant science·2026
Same author

Wound-Healing Potential of Engineered Lysin GRC-ML07 in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Infected Wounds in Immunocompromised Mice.

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Taxonomically different symbiotic communities of sympatric Arctic sponge species show functional similarity with specialization at species level.

mSystems·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

19.0K

Benchmarking Cost-Effective DNA Extraction Kits for Diverse Metagenomic Samples.

Andrey Sobolev1, Daria Sibiryakina1, Elizaveta Chevokina1

  • 1The Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Moscow 121205, Russia.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
|December 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Several cost-effective DNA extraction kits rival or surpass expensive commercial standards for metagenomic research. This study benchmarks kits for various environmental and host-associated samples, guiding selection for optimal microbial DNA purification.

Keywords:
16S sequencingDNA purificationbenchmarkcost-effectivenessenvironmental samplesmetagenomics

More Related Videos

A Magnetic-Bead-Based Mosquito DNA Extraction Protocol for Next-Generation Sequencing
05:34

A Magnetic-Bead-Based Mosquito DNA Extraction Protocol for Next-Generation Sequencing

Published on: April 15, 2021

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Cost-Effective Transcriptomic Drug Screening - Unlocking New Targets
06:40

Author Spotlight: Cost-Effective Transcriptomic Drug Screening - Unlocking New Targets

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

19.0K
A Magnetic-Bead-Based Mosquito DNA Extraction Protocol for Next-Generation Sequencing
05:34

A Magnetic-Bead-Based Mosquito DNA Extraction Protocol for Next-Generation Sequencing

Published on: April 15, 2021

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Cost-Effective Transcriptomic Drug Screening - Unlocking New Targets
06:40

Author Spotlight: Cost-Effective Transcriptomic Drug Screening - Unlocking New Targets

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Genomics
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • High-quality microbial DNA extraction is crucial for metagenomics.
  • Commercial kits are often expensive and may not suit all sample types.
  • Fragmented DNA and contamination are common challenges in environmental samples.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark eight commercial DNA extraction kits against a reference standard.
  • To evaluate cost-effective alternatives for large-scale metagenomic studies.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate DNA purification methods for diverse sample types.

Main Methods:

  • Benchmarking of eight commercial DNA extraction kits (Magen, SkyGen, Sileks) against Qiagen reference kits.
  • Analysis of four sample types: freshwater, seafloor sediments, oyster gut microbiome, and mammalian feces.
  • Assessment of DNA yield, integrity, purity, PCR inhibitors, eukaryotic DNA, microbial community composition, diversity, reproducibility, and contamination using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.

Main Results:

  • Several alternative kits performed comparably or better than the reference standard.
  • Magen Soil and Magen Bacterial kits showed high yield and reproducibility.
  • SkyGen Stool kits were effective for host-associated samples; Sileks kits preserved diversity in sediments.
  • Magen Microbiome kits consistently underperformed.

Conclusions:

  • Identified multiple cost-effective DNA extraction strategies for metagenomics.
  • Demonstrated that alternative kits can be suitable replacements for expensive commercial options.
  • Provided practical recommendations for selecting DNA purification methods based on sample type and research goals.