Related Experiment Video For basal cell carcinoma
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition
Published on: August 18, 2022
Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography of Basal Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Correlation with Histopathology
Lucas Boussingault1,2, Clément Lenoir1,3, Alessandro Di Stefani4,5
1Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent skin cancer in Caucasian populations. While dermoscopy supports diagnosis, accurate subtype classification requires histopathology. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) offers high resolution, adequate penetration, and three-dimensional imaging, bridging the gap between dermoscopy and histopathology. This study assessed the concordance between LC-OCT and histopathology for BCC criteria and subtypes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 127 histopathologically confirmed BCCs from the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels. LC-OCT images and corresponding histopathological slides were evaluated. Objective analysis used a predefined checklist of LC-OCT criteria compared with histopathology. Subjective analysis consisted of independent side-by-side assessments of global resemblance by three observers with varying expertise. Concordance rates and κ statistics were calculated. Results: The objective analysis showed the highest concordance (≥80%) for lobules, blood vessels, bright cells, lobule location, and dermal-epidermal junction disruption. Intermediate concordance (50-80%) was found for hemispheric morphology, outer bright rim, stromal stretching, and parakeratosis. Inner dark rim and palisading showed low concordance (<50%). Subjective evaluations demonstrated strong resemblance between LC-OCT and histopathology (overall concordance 81.1%), ranging from 86.6% to 98.4% across observers. Interobserver agreement was slight overall (κ = 0.10, p = 0.02), with one moderate pairwise κ (0.41). Conclusions: LC-OCT demonstrates good concordance with histopathology for key diagnostic and subtype-discriminating BCC features. Despite variability in subtle criteria, the findings support LC-OCT as a clinically relevant tool for non-invasive diagnosis and management of BCC.

