Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Comparing Objective Conjunctival Hyperemia Grading and the Ocular Surface Disease Index Score in Dry Eye Syndrome During COVID-19
Published on: May 25, 2022
A Comprehensive Review Comparing Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Diagnostic Approaches for Dry Eye Disease
Manal El Harti1, Said Jai Andaloussi1, Ouail Ouchetto1
1Laboratory of Data Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science Ain Chock, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca 20100, Morocco.
Artificial intelligence (AI) shows great promise for diagnosing dry eye disease (DED), often matching or exceeding human accuracy. Further research is needed to address data diversity and reproducibility for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Dry eye disease (DED) affects a significant portion of the population, necessitating accurate and efficient diagnostic methods.
- Current clinical assessments for DED can be subjective and time-consuming.
- The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential advancements in objective and automated DED diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize studies comparing AI-based diagnostic models with traditional clinical tests for DED.
- To evaluate the performance of AI models across various imaging modalities used in ophthalmology.
- To identify limitations and propose recommendations for future AI research in DED diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search adhering to PRISMA guidelines across four major databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library).
- Inclusion of 30 peer-reviewed articles published between 2020 and 2025, focusing on AI in DED diagnosis.
- Analysis of studies based on AI models, imaging modalities, diagnostic performance, and reported limitations.
Main Results:
- Deep learning models across diverse imaging modalities (e.g., videokeratography, OCT, meibography) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for DED, ranging from 82% to 99%.
- AI models frequently matched or surpassed the performance of established clinical assessments.
- Limited external validation and lack of focus on inter-expert variability were noted as common limitations.
Conclusions:
- AI holds significant potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of dry eye disease diagnosis in ophthalmology.
- Addressing gaps in data diversity, external validation, and reproducibility is crucial for the clinical implementation of AI tools.
- Future research should focus on robust validation and standardization to facilitate AI integration into routine eye care practices.
More Related Videos
07:36Clinical Application of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy and Radio Frequency for Treatment of Ocular Surface Diseases
Published on: July 3, 2025
08:13In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Dry Eye: A Focus on Imaging Protocols and Interpretation
Published on: November 11, 2025