Effects of Different Protein Feeds on Nutrient Digestion, Energy Metabolism, Methane Emissions, and Rumen Microbiota...

Making full use of feed nutrients, reducing energy losses and methane emissions, and maximizing production benefits have been ongoing goals of livestock production. Thirty-six healthy Dorper × Thin-tailed Han mutton ewes were divided into six groups using a completely randomized experimental design. A basal diet was provided to the control group, while the experimental group consumed a diet in which 15% was replaced by equal amounts of cottonseed meal (CM), rapeseed meal (RM), distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), soybean meal (SM), and fermented soybean meal (FSM). The study demonstrated that SM had the highest protein digestibility, followed by FSM, DDGS, and CM in that order. In terms of net energy, DDGS showed a significantly higher value compared to FSM (p < 0.05). Significantly higher abundances of Lactobacillaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae were observed in the CM group relative to the RM and FSM groups (p < 0.05). The methane emissions that we were most concerned about, whether it was daily emissions or metabolic weight basis, showed the same disparity between the groups, with the RM group having the most, followed in order by FSM, DDGS, and SM groups, and the least by the CM group. We found that the RM group had the highest relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter, followed by the FSM, SM, DDGS, and CM groups in that order, which is similar to the trend of methane emissions from each group. In summary, the highest apparent protein digestibility is SM, and the highest net energy value among these protein feeds is DDGS. RM will produce the most methane. In addition, the source of protein feed in the diet will affect the structural composition of rumen microorganisms.