Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

03:59
Surgical Correction for Pediatric Epiblepharon and Trichiasis
Published on: July 8, 2025
430
Peri-Eyebrow Incision: A Practical and Aesthetic Solution for Forehead Lipoma Surgery
Dong Wan Kim1, Ho Jun Lee1, Seung Hyun Kim1
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|December 11, 2025
Summary
The peri-eyebrow incision offers a safe and cosmetically effective alternative for forehead lipoma removal, providing concealed scars comparable to hairline approaches, especially when other methods are unsuitable.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Dermatologic Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Forehead lipomas present cosmetic concerns, with conventional surgical approaches leaving noticeable scars or being unsuitable for certain patient groups.
- Direct transcutaneous incisions offer easy access but result in visible scarring.
- Hairline incisions conceal scars but are not ideal for patients with baldness, high hairlines, or lower forehead lipomas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and cosmetic outcomes of a peri-eyebrow incision approach for forehead lipoma excision.
- To compare the peri-eyebrow method with conventional direct and hairline incision techniques.
- To identify predictors for selecting the peri-eyebrow incision, particularly the vertical ratio of lipoma location.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 176 patients undergoing forehead mass excision, with 97 biopsy-proven lipomas analyzed.
- Classification of lipomas based on location (peri-eyebrow, hairline, direct) and measurement of vertical ratio.
- Logistic regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine predictors of peri-eyebrow incision use.
- Scar quality assessment using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales.
Main Results:
- The peri-eyebrow incision was exclusively used for midline or median lipomas with the highest vertical ratio (0.70 ± 0.10).
- Vertical ratio independently predicted peri-eyebrow incision selection (adjusted OR 3.32 per 0.1-unit increase, p < 0.001), with an optimal cut-off of 0.615 (AUC 0.872).
- Peri-eyebrow and hairline incisions yielded significantly superior scar quality scores compared to direct incisions (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- The peri-eyebrow incision is a safe and cosmetically advantageous alternative for forehead lipoma removal.
- This approach effectively conceals scars and provides outcomes comparable to hairline incisions.
- It is particularly useful when hairline incisions are contraindicated due to patient factors or lipoma location.

