Time to Decompression in Obstructive Urosepsis from Ureteral Calculi: Thresholds, Initial Diversion, and Early...

Background/Objectives: Obstructive urosepsis mandates rapid source control, yet actionable time-to-decompression (TTD) thresholds and the influence of diversion route remain debated. This review synthesized evidence on TTD, early outcomes, and predictive biomarkers. Methods: Following PRISMA-2020, ten studies met eligibility: three large administrative cohorts and seven clinical series/trials comparing outcomes by TTD and/or initial decompression (retrograde stent [RUS] vs. percutaneous nephrostomy [PCN]) and reporting biomarkers. Results: Delays were consistently harmful. In a national cohort, a TTD of ≥ 2 days increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.63). Another analysis showed mortality of 0.16% with ≤48 h vs. 0.47% when delayed (derived OR, 0.43; p = 0.044). Absence of decompression yielded the highest mortality (19.2% vs. 8.82%; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9-3.7). Septic shock remained frequent despite low crude mortality in clinical series: 20.8% and 33.3% across two cohorts. Post-decompression urosepsis occurred in 18.7% in a randomized study and was associated with pyonephrosis and higher procalcitonin (PCT). An ED cohort showed that earlier stenting reduced length of stay (≤6 h: 35.6 h vs. 71.6 h, p = 0.01; ≤10 h: 45.7 h vs. 82.4 h, p = 0.04). Modality effects were modest; one cohort reported higher ICU use with PCN vs. RUS (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.24-8.41), likely reflecting confounding by indication. Conclusions: Across designs, timeliness-not device choice-was the dominant determinant of early outcomes. Biomarkers (notably, PCT) and imaging features can prioritize ultra-early decompression.