Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Clinical Phenotypes in Hypertension: A Data-Driven Approach to Risk Stratification
Elisa Rauseo1,2,3, Ahmed M Salih1,3,4,5, Jackie Cooper1
1William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre (E.R., A.M.S., J.C., M.A., S.C., H.N., P.B.M., N.A., S.E.P.), Queen Mary University London, Charterhouse Square, United Kingdom.
Insights
Unsupervised machine learning identified three distinct hypertension phenotypes. One male-predominant cluster showed high atherosclerosis and greatest cardiovascular risk, while another resembled metabolic syndrome with moderate risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Genetics
Background:
- Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease, but its diverse nature complicates risk assessment.
- Unsupervised machine learning offers a way to identify distinct patient subgroups for better risk stratification and targeted prevention.
- This study aimed to use a data-driven approach to define hypertension phenotypes and their links to cardiovascular outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct clinical phenotypes of hypertension using unsupervised machine learning.
- To investigate the association of these phenotypes with cardiovascular imaging characteristics and adverse clinical outcomes.
- To evaluate the mediating role of cardiac imaging features in the relationship between hypertension phenotypes and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 14,840 UK Biobank participants with diagnosed hypertension and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging data.
- Application of k-means clustering to 77 clinical variables to identify distinct hypertension clusters.
- Examination of associations between clusters and outcomes (heart failure, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic events, mortality) adjusted for risk factors, with mediation analyses for imaging features.
Main Results:
- Three distinct hypertension clusters were identified.
- Cluster 2, predominantly male with high atherosclerosis, exhibited the highest risk for all adverse cardiovascular events, linked to severe cardiac remodeling and dysfunction.
- Cluster 3, resembling metabolic syndrome, showed moderate risks for atrial fibrillation and mortality, with risk partially mediated by left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial dysfunction.
Conclusions:
- Clustering analysis successfully identified distinct hypertension phenotypes with unique risk profiles.
- These findings suggest that a data-driven approach can improve hypertension risk stratification.
- Tailored treatment strategies may be developed based on these identified phenotypes.
Background:
Hypertension is a major contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Its heterogeneity complicates risk stratification. Unsupervised machine learning can uncover risk profiles and refine preventative strategies. This study applied a data-driven approach to identify clinical phenotypes of hypertension, examine their associations with cardiovascular imaging characteristics and adverse outcomes, and assess the mediating role of cardiac imaging features in these associations.
Methods:
Fourteen thousand eight hundred forty UK Biobank participants with diagnosed hypertension and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed. K-means clustering was applied to 77 clinical variables. Associations with incident heart failure, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic events, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events were examined and adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors. Mediation analyses assessed the role of cardiovascular imaging features in the association between clusters and outcomes.
Results:
Three clusters emerged. Cluster 1, predominantly female with the most favorable metabolic profile, had the lowest risk. Cluster 2, predominantly male with the highest atherosclerosis burden, carried the greatest risk for all adverse events, independent of cardiovascular risk factors. They showed severe cardiac remodeling, impaired cardiac mechanisms, and global left atrial dysfunction. Cluster 3 had a profile resembling metabolic syndrome, with moderate risk for atrial fibrillation and all-cause death (hazard ratio, 1.65 and 1.58; P<0.05). Although in cluster 2 the risk was largely mediated by left ventricular hypertrophy, in cluster 3 its role was attenuated and more evenly balanced with left atrial dysfunction.
Conclusions:
Clustering analysis identified distinct hypertension phenotypes with specific risk profiles, suggesting potential for improved stratification and more tailored treatment approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

