Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Denosumab and Bazedoxifene on Pedicle Screw Stability in Osteoporotic Spines
Tomoyuki Asada1, Soji Tani2, Tomoko Towatari2
1Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA.
Introduction:
Pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spines remains challenging. Bazedoxifene (BZA) and denosumab (Dmab) are widely used agents for osteoporosis, but their comparative effects on spinal instrumentation are not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of BZA and Dmab on biomechanical parameters of spinal instrumentation using finite element analysis (FEA).
Methods:
In this prospective, open-label study, postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis were assigned to receive either BZA (daily oral, 20 mg) or Dmab (subcutaneous, 60 mg every 6 months) for 12 months. FEA models of the L4 vertebra were generated from CT scans using a calibration phantom (Mindways, Austin, TX, USA). Vertebral compression force was evaluated to represent overall vertebral strength. Pedicle screw fixation strength was assessed under axial (pullout strength) and non-axial directional forces (cranial, caudal, lateral, medial). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable regression were used to balance baseline differences and compare biomechanical outcomes between groups.
Results:
Thirty patients were enrolled (15 per group); the final analysis included 12 in the BZA group and 13 in the Dmab group. Compared to BZA, Dmab significantly improved compression strength (adjusted mean difference: 8.1% [95% CI, 0.9-15.3], p = 0.030) and pullout strength (15.8% [95% CI, 6.2-25.4], p = 0.003). Directional FEA revealed greater resistance to cranial (17.4% [95% CI, 4.9-30.0], p = 0.009) and lateral (10.8% [95% CI, 0.9-20.8], p = 0.035) loading with Dmab, while no significant difference was observed in caudal- and medial-directed force.
Conclusion:
Finite element modeling suggested that Dmab enhanced pedicle screw fixation more effectively than BZA, particularly against axial and cranial/lateral-directed forces. These biomechanical differences underscore the potential advantage of Dmab in preoperative osteoporosis management to improve pedicle screw stability.
More Related Videos
07:12Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
Published on: September 28, 2017
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I
Indeterminate Structure
Plastic Deformations of Members with a Single Plane of Symmetry
Stability of structures
Euler's Formula for Pin-Ended Columns
To calculate the critical load, envision...
Euler's Formula to Columns: Problem Solving
The system comprises two vertical rigid bars, AB and BC, of...