Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Polygenic Risk Scores for Preeclampsia Prediction Beyond Gold-Standard Clinical Models in Multiethnic Populations
Maddalena Ardissino1,2,3,4, Kypros Nicolaides4,5, Frances Conti-Ramsden4
1Medical Research Council, Laboratory of Medical Sciences Imperial College London UK.
Insights
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer modest improvement for predicting preeclampsia in European ancestry women. Their utility is limited in African ancestry women due to underrepresentation in genetic studies, highlighting a need for equitable development.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Genomics
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Reproductive Health
Background:
- Preeclampsia poses significant risks to maternal and fetal well-being.
- Early identification of high-risk pregnancies is crucial for implementing preventative measures.
- The predictive value of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for preeclampsia requires further investigation, especially across diverse ancestries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the added predictive value of preeclampsia and systolic blood pressure PRS in first-trimester prediction models.
- To compare PRS performance against established clinical and advanced prediction models.
- To assess PRS performance across different ancestral groups.
Main Methods:
- Two prospective pregnancy cohorts (Fetal Medicine Foundation and Pregnancy Outcome Prediction studies) were analyzed.
- Risk models incorporated clinical factors, PRS, and advanced first-trimester markers (mean arterial pressure, PAPP-A, uterine artery pulsatility index).
- Discriminative performance was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and assessed by ancestry.
Main Results:
- Preeclampsia PRS showed independent association with preeclampsia, modestly improving prediction over clinical models (AUC 0.746 vs. 0.750).
- No significant improvement was observed when PRS were added to the advanced model (AUC 0.817 vs. 0.818).
- Systolic blood pressure PRS improved prediction in European ancestry women but not in African ancestry women.
Conclusions:
- PRS for preeclampsia and systolic blood pressure offer limited additional predictive value beyond clinical factors in European ancestry women.
- Underrepresentation in genome-wide association studies limits the utility of current PRS in African ancestry populations.
- Refined PRS models and larger cohorts may enhance equitable risk stratification in maternal health in the future.
Background:
Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. Early risk stratification enables timely preventative therapy in high-risk women. Polygenic risk scores (PGS) improve prediction in complex diseases, but their added value for preeclampsia remains unclear, particularly in comparison to gold-standard first-trimester prediction models and across non-European ancestries.
Methods:
We evaluated the performance of both a preeclampsia and systolic blood pressure PGS in 2 prospective pregnancy cohorts with detailed phenotyping: the Fetal Medicine Foundation study (n=5207; 2127 cases) and the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study (n=3659; 228 cases). Risk models included (1) clinical factors; (2) clinical factors plus PGS; (3) advanced model including first-trimester mean arterial pressure, PAPP-A (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A), and uterine artery pulsatility index; and (4) advanced model plus PGS. Discriminative performance, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was assessed overall and by ancestry.
Results:
The preeclampsia PGS was independently associated with preeclampsia (odds ratio per SD, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.31]; P<0.001). It modestly improved prediction over clinical models (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.746 versus 0.750; P=0.017) but not over the advanced model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.817 versus 0.818; P=0.326). The systolic blood pressure PGS showed stronger performance, improving prediction over both models in women of European ancestry. No improvement was observed with either score in women of African ancestry.
Conclusions:
PGSs for preeclampsia and SBP provide modest added predictive value beyond clinical risk factors in European ancestry women. Limited utility in African ancestry women reflects underrepresentation in the genome-wide association studies used to develop current scores. As cohort sizes grow and models are refined, PGSs may become important tools for equitable risk stratification in maternal health.
More Related Videos
05:31Author Spotlight: Modeling an Aspect of Preeclampsia in Female Mice Using Hypoxic Human Placenta-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles
Published on: January 26, 2024
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Polygenic Traits
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis