Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Vulnerable patient groups in the Emergency Department: association with hospitalization, Intensive Care Unit
Fabienne Hilpert1, Henk B Riedel1, Roland Bingisser1
1Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 2, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland.
Background:
While triage systems focus on clinical acuity, patients at risk due to underlying vulnerabilities may be overlooked. Identifying specific vulnerability markers at triage could enhance early risk stratification. This study investigates the association between predefined vulnerability markers and adverse outcomes in emergency department patients, independently of triage level and presenting complaint.
Methods:
Prospective study of an all-comer population presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. The patients were attributed to one or more vulnerable groups at triage.
Results:
Among the 4191 included patients, several vulnerability markers were associated with adverse outcomes after adjustment for age and sex. Patients with cognitive impairment had significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-4.32]. Intensive care unit admission was more likely in patients with immunosuppression (OR 4.13; 95% CI, 2.14-7.40), substance use disorder (OR 1.82; 95% CI, 1.03-3.02), and diabetes (OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.07-2.71). Hospital admission was associated with cognitive impairment, immunosuppression, substance use disorder, diabetes, recent surgical intervention, and psychiatric comorbidities. In contrast, no significant associations with adverse outcomes were found for those with medical devices, acutely intoxicated patients, pregnancy, migrant status, or patients with recent trauma.
Conclusions:
Certain vulnerability markers identifiable at triage are associated with specific adverse outcomes. These findings highlight the potential of pragmatic, early vulnerability assessment to improve risk stratification in the emergency department.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
06:52Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Planning Nursing Care I