Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Preventing Acute Care Use in Oncology Patients Following Systemic Therapy Using Medicare
Sara Alessandra Keller1,2, Maximilian Schuessler3, Behzad Naderalvojoud1
1Division of Computational Medicine, Stanford University, 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA, 94305-5479, United States, 1 650-725-5507.
Background:
Acute care use (ACU) represents a major economic burden in oncology, which can ideally be prevented. Existing models effectively predict such events.
Objective:
We aimed to quantify the cost savings achieved by implementing a model to predict ACU in oncology patients undergoing systemic therapy.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with cancer at an academic medical center from 2010 to 2022. We included patients who received systemic therapy and identified ACU events occurring after treatment initiation, excluding those with known death dates within the study period. Data on ACU-related expenses were gathered from Medicare claims and mapped to service codes in electronic health records, yielding average daily costs for each patient over 180 days following the start of therapy. The exposure was an ACU event.
Results:
The main outcome was the average daily cost per patient at the end of the first 180 days of systemic therapy. We observed that expense accumulation flattened earlier and more rapidly among non-ACU patients. This study included 20,556 patients, of whom 3820 (18.58%) experienced at least 1 ACU. The average daily cost per patient for those with and without ACU was US $94.62 (SD US $72.54; 95% CI US $92.32-$96.92) and US $53.28 (SD US $59.92; 95% CI US $52.37-$54.19), respectively. The average total cost per ACU and non-ACU patient was US $17,031.92 (SD US $13,056.63; 95% CI US $16,616.74-$17,445.09) and US $9591.06 (SD US $10,785.83; 95% CI US $9427.64-$9754.48), respectively. To estimate the long-term financial impact of deploying the predictive model, we conducted a cost-benefit analysis based on an annual cohort size of 2177 patients. In the first year alone, the model yielded projected savings of US $910,000. By year 6, projected savings grew to US $9.46 million annually. The cumulative avoided costs over a 6-year deployment period totaled approximately US $31.11 million. These estimates compared the baseline cost model to the intervention model assuming a prevention rate of 35% for preventable ACU events and an average ACU cost of US $17,031.92 (SD US $13,037).
Conclusions:
Predictive analytics can significantly reduce costs associated with ACU events, enhancing economic efficiency in cancer care. Further research is needed to explore potential health benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
