Leveraging multi-organ models for drug combination therapy safety

Valentin Mieville1, Jakub Gubala1, Seungsu Han2

  • 1School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Translational Research Center in Oncohaematology, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.

Insights

A new in vitro platform assesses multidrug combination toxicity in organs like the kidney and liver. Biologically relevant models are crucial for predicting severe drug-induced toxicity, unlike simple cell lines.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Toxicology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Assessing systemic toxicity of multidrug combinations is critical for personalized medicine.
  • Existing methods may not accurately predict organ-specific toxicities or combination effects.
  • Clinically relevant timeframes are needed for efficient drug development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a streamlined in vitro platform for assessing systemic toxicity of multidrug combinations.
  • To compare the predictive power of different cellular models for drug-induced toxicity.
  • To evaluate the organ-specific toxicity profiles of multidrug combinations.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a multi-organ in vitro platform using cellular models of kidney, liver, and heart.
  • Evaluation of two multidrug combinations (C2 and REMP) using the platform.
  • Comparison of toxicity responses between simple cell lines and advanced organoid/spheroid models.

Main Results:

  • The platform identified distinct organ-specific toxicity profiles for multidrug combinations.
  • Some drug-induced toxicities were exacerbated in combination therapy.
  • Advanced models (organoids, spheroids) showed higher sensitivity and better prediction of toxicity severity compared to simple cell lines.
  • C2 combination demonstrated significantly higher toxicity in kidney organoids and differentiated hepatocyte spheroids compared to simpler cell models.
  • Lactate dehydrogenase release indicated significant toxicity for C2.

Conclusions:

  • Biologically relevant in vitro platforms are essential for accurate systemic toxicity assessment of drug combinations.
  • Simple cell lines may underestimate the severity of drug-induced toxicity.
  • The developed platform shows translational potential for early-stage toxicity screening in personalized cancer therapy development.

Related Concept Videos

Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism01:27

Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism

Synergism is a useful mechanism where combining two or more drugs is more effective than each constituent used alone. Such combinations are also called supra-additive interactions. The drugs collectively enhance the final therapeutic effect by acting on different targets. Another advantage is that the low dose of each constituent drug is sufficient to achieve the desired effect. This helps reduce the duration of therapy and lower the adverse effects of these drugs.
Such synergistic combinations...
6.7K
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...
141
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
474
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
1.8K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.8K
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
309