Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
An Australian experience of the Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic
Hussein Al-Fiadh1, Robert Azzopardi2,3, Marwan Shawki4,3
1Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia. half0001@student.monash.edu.
Abstract:
Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic (RACPAC) offers an outpatient evaluation for patients with troponin-negative, low-to-intermediate risk chest pain. This 10-year study assessed its role in the early identification of patients at cardiovascular risk and compared the modes of coronary investigation performances. A single-centre, observational, retrospective cohort study from July 2012 to July 2022 assessed patients who underwent diagnostic tests: CT coronary angiography (CTCA), treadmill stress echocardiogram (TSE), myocardial perfusion scan (MPS), or invasive coronary angiogram (ICA). True positive cases were defined by obstructive disease on subsequent ICA. Baseline characteristics, investigation choice, results, conversion rates to ICA, and identification of new modifiable risk factors to potentially reduce future cardiovascular events were analysed. A total of 3976 patients with low-to-intermediate risk chest pain, mean age (55.2 ± 11.6) years, 51% male, with prevalent risk factors such as positive family history (49%) and dyslipidaemia (42%). Initial investigations: TSE (49.2%), CTCA (43.7%), MPS (4.6%), and ICA (2.5%). CTCA showed superior performance compared to TSE in positive predictive value (97% vs. 82%), negative predictive value (66% vs. 27%) for those proceeding to ICA despite initial negative/inconclusive results, and attendance rates (97% vs. 92%). Incidental findings occurred in 4% of cases, predominantly with CTCA. New modifiable CVD risk factors were identified in 33% of patients, and 17% had CAD with pre-existing CVD risk factors needing stricter control. Our study highlights the effectiveness of CTCA as a primary investigation for troponin-negative, low-to-intermediate risk chest pain patients, with high predictive values, incidental findings and attendance rates. It also emphasises RACPAC's potential role in identifying patients at cardiovascular disease risk and perhaps reducing future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
More Related Videos
08:22The Application of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS) in the Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: December 12, 2025
05:58Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation