Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Initial programme theory developing for interprofessional case discussions (InCaD) in acute hospital care: a realist
Julien Pöhner1, Kathrin Seibert2, Eva-Maria Regelmann2
1School of Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Am Brill 2-4, 28195, Bremen, Germany. julien.poehner@hs-bremen.de.
Background:
Interprofessional case discussions (InCaD) are vital for managing complex patient care in acute hospital settings. Despite their widespread use, the absence of theoretical frameworks hinders consistent implementation and evaluation. This study aims to develop an initial programme theory for InCaD using a realist methodology to identify Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations.
Methods:
This study employed a multi-method approach grounded in the realist methodology following a prospective approach of the RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. Data were collected from three sources: internal programme documents, a systematic review (N = 42), and stakeholder focus group interviews (N = 17) involving nurses, physicians, managers and therapists. Internal programme documents provided an understanding of theoretical foundations and informed the review and interview design. The systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and included studies on multiprofessional case discussions in inpatient settings. Focus group interviews were conducted with hospital stakeholders to explore practical insights into the implementation and impact of InCaD. Data synthesis involved generating CMO-configurations through thematic coding and iterative team discussions.
Results:
The analysis identified direct mechanisms, such as interprofessional reflection, structured protocols, and shared decision-making, and indirect mechanisms, such as fostering team trust and a culture of learning. Key outcomes for patients included improved care quality, satisfaction, and continuity, while staff outcomes encompassed enhanced job satisfaction, team cohesion, and workflow efficiency. Contextual factors, including leadership support and tailored adaptations, were crucial for successful implementation. Nurse leadership emerged as a significant driver of InCaD's effectiveness.
Conclusions:
This study provides a theory-driven framework for systematically implementing and evaluating InCaD in clinical practice. By understanding the interactions of context, mechanisms, and outcomes, healthcare organizations can enhance patient safety, care quality, and staff well-being. Future research should validate and refine these findings in diverse healthcare settings to inform broader applications.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Planning Nursing Care I
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care