Epilepsy-associated CHD2 missense variants and optimization strategies for genetic diagnosis: a comparative analysis
Yu-Jie Gu1,2, Peng-Yu Wang2, Qing-Qing Fu1
1Department of Neurology, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, China.
Background:
The CHD2 gene is one of the most common causative genes of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). With the advent of high-throughput sequencing, identifying CHD2 variants has increased, necessitating evaluation of the gene-specific performance of widely used tools, as genome-wide benchmarks may mask such heterogeneity.
Methods:
The dataset of pathogenic and control CHD2 missense variants was curated from ClinVar, HGMD, and PubMed databases. Tools included SIFT, SIFT4G, Polyphen2_HDIV, Polyphen2_HVAR, MutationAssessor, PROVEAN, MetaSVM, MetaLR, MetaRNN, M-CAP, MutPred2, PrimateAI, DEOGEN2, BayesDel_addAF, BayesDel_noAF, ClinPred, LIST-S2, ESM1b, AlphaMissense, and fathmm-XF_coding. The in silico tools were evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), F-score, and area under the ROC curve (AUC).
Result:
A total of 27 missense variants which were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic were used as a positive set, and 57 missense variants were used as a negative set. The top tools in accuracy are MutPred2, ESM1b, AlphaMissense, and PROVEAN. In terms of the MCC and F score, the higher degree was observed in MutPred2 and AlphaMissense (MCC score >0.8). ClinPred, AlphaMissense, and BayesDel_addAF had a higher AUC score (AUC > 0.99). SIFT, SIFT4G, Polyphen2_HDIV, Polyphen2_HVAR, ClinPred, and AlphaMissense scores exhibited a distinct bimodal distribution. While scores from other predictors showed a wider distribution range.
Conclusion:
Our study highlights the significant variation in the performance of different in silico tools for predicting CHD2 missense variant pathogenicity. Given its overall performance, MutPred2 and AlphaMissense may be the preferred choice for clinical application in CHD2-associated DEE, providing possible reference in optimizing genetic diagnosis and classification of CHD2 missense variants.
More Related Videos
08:04Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
Published on: June 6, 2025
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
02:26Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
01:11Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...