Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Manufacturing Chimeric Antigen Receptor CAR T Cells for Adoptive Immunotherapy
Published on: December 17, 2019
Recipient-derived vs. donor-derived CAR-T-cell therapy in relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients after
Lichao Liu1,2,3, Yongxian Hu4, Ruihao Huang1,2,3
1Medical Center of Hematology, Institute of Science Innovation for Blood Ecology and Intelligent Cells, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Background:
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells have been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). T cells for CAR-T therapy can be derived from the peripheral blood (recipient) of the patient or donor. Despite having identical genomes, the different maturation environments of these T cells can lead to functional differences. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of CAR-T cells derived from these two sources.
Methods:
This multicenter, retrospective cohort study collected clinical data from 36 patients who experienced B-ALL relapse after allo-HSCT and received CD19 CAR-T cell therapy between January 2016 and October 2023 across seven centers. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR)/CR with an incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate at 28 days post-CAR-T cell infusion. Secondary endpoints included the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate, incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and CAR-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES).
Results:
A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients: 12 in the recipient group and 24 in the donor group. The recipient and donor groups showed no statistically significant differences in CR/CRi rates (83.3% vs. 100.0%, P = 0.105), 2-year EFS rates (50.8% vs. 51.6%, P = 0.617), or 2-year OS rates (49.5% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.215). In addition, the incidences of GVHD, CRS, and CRES did not significantly differ between the two groups. Further analysis within the donor group revealed 12 matched sibling donors (MSDs) and 12 haploidentical donors (HIDs). The 2-year EFS rate was statistically significantly greater in the HID group than in the MSD group (75.0% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.043), whereas no significant differences were observed in the CR/CRi rates, 2-year OS, or the incidence of GVHD, CRS, and CRES between these subgroups.
Conclusions:
Both recipient-derived and donor-derived CD19 CAR-T cell therapies are effective treatment options for B-ALL relapsed post-allo-HSCT patients. HID-derived CAR-T cells offer a longer EFS and may be considered the optimal choice.
Trial Registration:
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No. ChiCTR2400085297.
More Related Videos
12:16A Syngeneic Mouse B-Cell Lymphoma Model for Pre-Clinical Evaluation of CD19 CAR T Cells
Published on: October 16, 2018
09:29Clinical Application of Sleeping Beauty and Artificial Antigen Presenting Cells to Genetically Modify T Cells from Peripheral and Umbilical Cord Blood
Published on: February 1, 2013