Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs DAPT After PCI in Patients With and Without STEMI: The NEO-MINDSET Substudy
Caio A M Tavares1, Patricia O Guimarães2, Marcelo Franken2
1Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background:
The effects of very early aspirin withdrawal with potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention may differ based on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presentation.
Objectives:
This prespecified analysis from the NEO-MINDSET trial evaluated whether treatment effects of early aspirin discontinuation differ between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS; defined as unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).
Methods:
NEO-MINDSET randomized ACS patients to potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy initiated within 4 days of hospitalization vs standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a potent P2Y12 inhibitor for 12 months. Co-primary outcomes were: 1) the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and urgent target vessel revascularization (ischemic outcome); and 2) Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (bleeding outcome).
Results:
Of the 3,410 participants included, 2,119 (62.1%) presented with STEMI and 1,291 (37.9%) with NSTE-ACS. Among STEMI patients, an early aspirin-free strategy was associated with a higher rate of the co-primary ischemic composite outcome compared with DAPT at 1 year (8.2% vs 5.2%, respectively; HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.14-2.24), whereas among those with NSTE-ACS, ischemic event rates were similar between monotherapy and DAPT (5.1% vs 6.0%, respectively; HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.53-1.35; P for interaction = 0.030). The co-primary bleeding outcome was lower with monotherapy than with DAPT in both STEMI (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.61) and NSTE-ACS (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.23-0.86) populations (P for interaction = 0.650).
Conclusions:
In patients with STEMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, early aspirin withdrawal may be harmful, because it increases the risk of ischemic events. Conversely, in NSTE-ACS, potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy may be a viable therapeutic option: Ischemic event rates were similar and bleeding was reduced compared with DAPT. (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Followed by Antiplatelet Monotherapy in the Setting of Acute Coronary Syndromes [NEOMINDSET]; NCT04360720).
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...