Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Large Language Models for Postoperative Decision Support: Comparative Analysis.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

OpenClaw and Multi-Agent AI in Plastic Surgery.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026
Same author

Managing Myopic Glaucoma-Beyond Structural Fragility and Diagnostic Challenges: Review Article.

Journal of current glaucoma practice·2026
Same author

Non-Interventional Study to Evaluate the Effect of Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Centration and Tilt on Visual Performance.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

Impact of Surgical Sequence on Outcomes of Combined Phacoemulsification and Kahook Dual Blade KDB Goniotomy: A 1-Year Prospective Comparative Study.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

Explainable Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment
05:40

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Published on: March 24, 2020

15.6K

Evaluating the Quality and Features of Visual Acuity Apps Using the Mobile App Rating Scale: Systematic Review.

P Connor Lentz1, Emily Dorairaj2, Pranav Vasu3

  • 1New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth
|December 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Mobile visual acuity (VA) apps show mixed quality, with similar scores on both platforms. Despite good functionality, low subjective quality and lack of validation limit clinical use, highlighting the need for better standards in teleophthalmology.

Keywords:
MARSMobile App Rating Scaleappclinicalclinical settingeyeeye careeye healthmhealthmobile appmobile healthophthalmologypatientrating scaletechnologytechnology-basedtelehealthtelemedicineteleophthalmologyvisual acuity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
05:10

Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.6K
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment
05:40

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Published on: March 24, 2020

15.6K
Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
05:10

Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.6K
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Digital Health
  • Mobile Technology

Background:

  • Mobile visual acuity (VA) apps are increasingly used in clinical and home settings, supporting teleophthalmology.
  • Limited studies evaluate the quality, functionality, and clinical relevance of available VA apps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the quality and features of mobile VA apps on iOS and Android platforms.
  • Utilized the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) for a standardized assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a comprehensive search of app stores (Jan-Mar 2024) for free, English-language VA apps.
  • Evaluated 44 eligible apps using MARS by two independent reviewers.
  • Extracted app characteristics and features, including optotypes and supplemental tests.

Main Results:

  • Common optotypes included Tumbling E, Snellen Chart, and Landolt C.
  • Supplemental features like color vision and astigmatism tests were frequent.
  • Average MARS scores were similar across platforms (Android: 3.04, iOS: 3.02), with high functionality ratings but low subjective quality.
  • Few apps were clinically validated, and only iOS apps showed correlation between MARS scores and star ratings.

Conclusions:

  • Mobile VA apps demonstrate significant heterogeneity in quality and features.
  • Neither platform consistently offers superior app quality, despite comparable overall scores.
  • Low subjective quality and lack of clinical validation hinder professional use, necessitating improved development and validation standards for teleophthalmology.