Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

9.7K
German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with...
9.7K
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

7.9K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
7.9K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT01:30

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

1.0K
Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and...
1.0K
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy01:26

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

11.9K
Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
11.9K
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

257
DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...
257

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reference Levels for Diagnostic and Interventional X-ray Exposures in Germany: Development, Handling, and Perspective.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2026
Same author

Anti-scatter grid performance in digital mammography and contrast-enhanced mammography: a Monte Carlo study.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

A response to the Vancouver call for action: addressing the needs of early career scientists in radiation protection.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2025
Same author

A nonparametric measure of contrast in x-ray images.

Physics in medicine and biology·2024
Same author

Dose-efficiency quantification of computed tomography systems using a model-observer.

Medical physics·2023
Same author

A nonparametric measure of noise in x-ray diagnostic images-mammography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography CT and Light Microscopy LM Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM
10:42

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography CT and Light Microscopy LM Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM

Published on: June 16, 2016

9.7K

Channelised Hotelling observer detectability index vs minimum detectable contrast for x-ray computed tomography.

Mathias Anton1, Patrizia Kunert2, Maximilian Göppel2

  • 1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|December 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares two computed tomography (CT) imaging metrics for low contrast resolution. The detectability index (d') is proportional to the inverse of the minimum detectable contrast (MDC) and object diameter, aiding in CT testing.

Keywords:
CTMDCSLCDlow contrast detectabilitymodel observerquality assurancex-ray diagnostics

More Related Videos

High Spatial Resolution Chemical Imaging of Implant-Associated Infections with X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging Through Tissue
07:48

High Spatial Resolution Chemical Imaging of Implant-Associated Infections with X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging Through Tissue

Published on: September 30, 2022

1.6K
Measurement of X-ray Beam Coherence along Multiple Directions Using 2-D Checkerboard Phase Grating
10:39

Measurement of X-ray Beam Coherence along Multiple Directions Using 2-D Checkerboard Phase Grating

Published on: October 11, 2016

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography CT and Light Microscopy LM Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM
10:42

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography CT and Light Microscopy LM Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM

Published on: June 16, 2016

9.7K
High Spatial Resolution Chemical Imaging of Implant-Associated Infections with X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging Through Tissue
07:48

High Spatial Resolution Chemical Imaging of Implant-Associated Infections with X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging Through Tissue

Published on: September 30, 2022

1.6K
Measurement of X-ray Beam Coherence along Multiple Directions Using 2-D Checkerboard Phase Grating
10:39

Measurement of X-ray Beam Coherence along Multiple Directions Using 2-D Checkerboard Phase Grating

Published on: October 11, 2016

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Radiological Sciences
  • Diagnostic Imaging Technology

Background:

  • Computed Tomography (CT) systems require robust methods for assessing low contrast resolution.
  • Current testing protocols may not fully capture the nuances of image quality across different systems and reconstruction methods.
  • Standardized figures of merit are crucial for acceptance and constancy testing in CT imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between the detectability index (d") and the minimum detectable contrast (MDC) for CT low contrast resolution.
  • To evaluate the utility of these figures of merit for acceptance and constancy testing of CT imaging systems.
  • To establish a basis for developing new standardized CT testing procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized simulated data and 29 CT image datasets from the MITA body phantom (CCT189).
  • Included CT devices from five manufacturers and various image reconstruction techniques.
  • Determined the detectability index (d") using the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) and compared it with the minimum detectable contrast (MDC).

Main Results:

  • A proportional relationship was found between d" and the inverse of the product of MDC and object diameter for the CHO with circular symmetric DDOG channels.
  • The proportionality factor was significantly influenced by noise texture.
  • d" can be determined using fewer images compared to traditional methods requiring hundreds of images per setting.

Conclusions:

  • The established relationship between d" and MDC provides a foundation for developing acceptance and constancy tests for CT low contrast resolution.
  • The findings support the use of d" (CHO) and MDC as key figures of merit for CT quality assurance.
  • This research contributes to more efficient and accurate CT system performance evaluation.