Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: May 23, 2011
Dual-site M1-DLPFC anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is superior to single-site stimulation in improving
Hosna Khoshchehreh1, Vahid Tadibi1, Parisa Banaei2
1Exercise Metabolism and Performance Lab (EMPL), Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Abstract:
Endurance performance relies on motor and executive control, mediated by the primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We hypothesized that dual-site anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (M1-DLPFC) would yield stronger effects on endurance performance, psychophysiological responses, and executive function during self-paced endurance task than single-site stimulation. Fourteen trained male cyclists participated in four randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled transcranial direct current stimulation sessions (M1, DLPFC, dual-site M1-DLPFC, sham; 2 mA, 20 min). After stimulation, they performed a 15-km self-paced cycling time trial. Heart rate, rating of perceived exertion, pleasure, and arousal were measured every 3 km, and executive function every 4 km. Endurance performance was defined as the time to completion. Dual-site M1-DLPFC was superior to M1, DLPFC, and sham in endurance performance. Both single-site stimulations also improved completion time relative to sham. Dual-site stimulation lowered heart rate versus sham and elicited the lowest ratings of perceived exertion, differing significantly from both single-site and sham conditions. Dual-site stimulation further elicited higher pleasure sensation and felt arousal at several distance points compared with sham and single-site conditions. It yielded superior cognitive performance in the backward counting task compared with all other conditions. Concurrent M1-DLPFC anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhanced self-paced endurance performance, reduced perceived exertion, improved affective responses, and preserved cognitive function during prolonged exertion more effectively than single-site stimulation. Clinical trial registry: IRCT20230729058958N1, registration date: 03.08.2023.
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...

