Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras
Published on: May 31, 2014
Immune-Neuroendocrine Phenotypic Expression Changes Through Life in Coturnix japonica Quails
Antonela Marozzi1,2, Silvia G Correa3, Rupert Palme4
1Biological and Technological Investigations Institute (IIByT), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) and National University of Cordoba (UNC), Cordoba, Argentina.
None:
Immune-neuroendocrine characteristics can be used to classify individuals according to their physiological profiles or phenotypes (INPs). In avian models such as quail and domestic chickens, three subgroups based on INPs have been defined: Lewis-like (pro-inflammatory polarization), Fischer-like (anti-inflammatory polarization), and an intermediate INP. This study investigates the stability and alterations of INPs throughout ontogeny, from juvenile to adult stages in four time-points including an exposure to unpredictable and diverse chronic stress (CS) during early adulthood. We measured corticosterone levels, pro- (IFN-γ and IL-1β) and anti-inflammatory (IL-13, IL-4) cytokines, phytohemagglutinin (PHA-P) lymphoproliferative response, anti-sheep red blood cells antibody (Ab SRBC) response, and leukocyte distribution frequency. Cluster analyses were conducted to classify bird based on their similarities across all analyzed variables, to thereby establish their INP at each time point. The extreme Lewis- or Fischer-like profiles were less represented in juvenile and pre-stress adult birds showing a higher proportion of individuals with an intermediate profile. Following CS exposure, the prevalence of Lewis-like and Fischer-like profiles increased. This shift persisted 10 weeks later as birds matured to an advanced egg-laying stage, with females predominantly exhibiting the Fischer-like INP, and males the Lewis-like INP. The observed shift in INP distribution following CS towards more polarized Lewis- and Fisher-like profiles implies a more even representation of the three observed profiles and may reflect inter-individual differences in physiological response to CS associated to particular coping strategies. A more even INPs distribution could provide the population with a greater advantage when facing diverse environmental challenges.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Complementation Tests
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
Pleiotropy
Epistasis
Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps
Transcription results in the generation of precursor (pre-mRNA) that consists of both exons and introns, which needs further processing before being translated to a...
Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps

