Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Evaluation of Integrated Anaerobic Digestion and Hydrothermal Carbonization for Bioenergy Production
Published on: June 15, 2014
Performance and cost-benefit analysis of an integrated earth-air heat exchanger and air handling unit system
Naim Ben Ali1, Joy Djuansjah2, Ihab Omar3
1Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Ha'il, Ha'il City, 81451, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Earth-Air Heat Exchanger (EAHE) systems present a sustainable solution to reduce the energy consumption of HVAC systems by utilizing stable subsurface temperatures for passive air conditioning. This study investigates the performance of an EAHE integrated with a central air conditioning system, focusing on the effects of pipe geometry, burial depth, cross section of pipe and thickness on thermal efficiency and economic viability. Despite extensive studies on EAHE systems, gaps remain in understanding the combined impact of pipe cross-section, thickness, and burial depth on system performance and cost-effectiveness. This study addresses these gaps by evaluating four pipe cross-sections (circular, square, rectangular, hexagonal) at varying depths (1-4 m) and thicknesses (5-20 mm) using a validated transient thermal model. A comprehensive analytical model was developed and validated against experimental and computational data to assess energy savings and operational benefits. The study employed an integrated MATLAB/EES-based computational framework to conduct a continuous parametric and economic analysis. This analytical approach systematically evaluated the effects of pipe geometry, burial depth, and thickness on the system's thermal performance and financial viability. Results show that rectangular pipes (410 mm perimeter) achieve the highest cooling efficiency (85%), reducing outlet air temperature by up to 10.5 °C compared to ambient conditions. Burial depth significantly influences performance, with 4 m depth yielding 38.2% compressor power savings nearly double that of 1 m depth (19.9%). Pipe length optimization reveals diminishing returns beyond 15 m, where 34.2% power savings are achieved with a 3.8-year payback period. Economic analysis identifies the 15 m rectangular pipe at 3-4 m depth as the optimal configuration, balancing efficiency (38.2% savings) and cost (payback: 3.8 years). These findings provide actionable insights for designing energy-efficient EAHE systems in HVAC applications.
More Related Videos
10:36Author Spotlight: Optimization of Airflow Velocities in Battery Cooling Systems for Enhanced Thermal Performance and Reduced Energy Consumption
Published on: November 3, 2023
04:35Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment
Published on: July 5, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Refrigerators and Heat Pumps
A household refrigerator removes heat from...
Heat Engines
Whenever we consider heat engines (and associated devices such as refrigerators and heat pumps), we do not use the standard sign convention for heat and work. For convenience, we assume that the symbols Qh, Qc, and W represent only the amounts of heat transferred...
Conduction, Convection and Radiation: Problem Solving
In order to solve a problem related to heat transfer, first of all, the situation needs to be examined to determine the type of heat transfer involved. This could...
Control Systems: Applications
In modern vehicles, control systems manage various functions to enhance performance and safety. The steering wheel and accelerator are primary inputs in a car's control system. The...
Heating and Cooling Curves
For instance, the addition of heat raises the temperature of a solid; the amount of heat absorbed depends on the heat capacity of the solid (q = mcsolidΔT). According to thermochemistry, the relation between the amount of heat absorbed or released by a substance, q, and its...
Efficiency of The Carnot Cycle