Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
Combined experimental and micro finite element analysis of CF/PEEK pedicle screw pullout
Dominic Mischler1, Matteo Frigelli2, Ivan Zderic1
1AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland.
Purpose:
Pedicle screw pull-out remains a challenge in thoracolumbar spine fixation, contributing to fixation failure. Computational simulations offer a pathway to optimize screw designs across diverse materials and bone qualities towards reducing failure rates. Non-linear explicit micro-finite element (μFE) simulation was hypothesized to accurately predict pullout forces of CF/PEEK screws, with bone volume fraction (BV/TV) influencing performance. This study aimed to validate the μFE model and assess BV/TV effects on the basis of experimental testing.
Methods:
Thirteen cadaveric vertebrae were instrumented with 4.5 mm (n = 13) and 5.5 mm (n = 9) CF/PEEK screws using sample-specific 3D-printed guides. Quasi-static pullout tests were conducted and simulated using non-linear explicit μFE models based on high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Regression analysis evaluated the relationship between BV/TV and pullout force. Correlation coefficient (R2), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), standard error of estimate (SEE), and relative standard error (RSE) were used to assess the agreement between experimental and μFE-predicted pullout forces.
Results:
The linear regression relationship between BV/TV and pullout force was significantly different for the 4.5 mm and 5.5 mm screws (p = 0.001). Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression showed significant BV/TV influence on pullout strength (p = 0.001 experimental, p < 0.001 μFE). Linear regression in log10-log10 space for experimental versus μFE forces showed strong correlation (R2 = 0.931, p < 0.001), despite μFE overprediction (slope = 0.752 vs. 1:1, p < 0.001; CCC = 0.745, SEE = 428.7 N, RSE = 85.2 %).
Conclusions:
The validated μFE model accurately predicted pullout strength of pedicle screw of different designs, supported by strong correlation with experimental data, despite light overprediction, potentially due to the lack of insertion damage modeling. The robust in silico framework can be used to enhance orthopedic screw designs, supporting improved fixation stability across diverse bone qualities.
More Related Videos
12:25C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position
Published on: September 16, 2022
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
Normal Strain under Axial Loading
Design of Transmission Shafts - Stress Analysis
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Eccentric Loading
Frictional Forces on Screws
A jack with a square-threaded screw is a mechanical device used to lift heavy loads by applying a force at its handle. When the force is applied, the screw turns, raising the load. The screw can...