Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Occlusion of the Great and Small Saphenous Vein Using Copolymeric Glue Based on N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Methacryloxy Sulfolane
Published on: December 9, 2022
Genome-wide association studies in chronic venous disease: A systematic review
Chien Lin Soh1, Matthew Tan1, Alun H Davies1
1Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Background:
Chronic venous disease (CVD) arises from venous hypertension secondary to impaired venous return, causing significant morbidity and diminished quality of life. Genetic factors are likely important in the pathogenesis and susceptibility of a patient to develop CVD. This systematic review summarizes genome-wide association studies (GWASs) that investigate the link between genetic variants and CVD.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, with the search dates ranging from January 1, 1994, to July 17, 2025. Abstract and full-text screening were completed by two independent reviewers, with any conflicts referred to a third senior reviewer. GWASs in adults investigating links between genetic variants and CVD were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with venous thromboembolism, arterial or diabetic disease, or animal models.
Results:
Thirteen studies were included after screening 517 studies from a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid. Database sources included UK Biobank, FinnGen, PopGen, and country- or hospital-specific databases with a majority Caucasian and European patient cohort. A total of 602,760 patients were identified with varicose veins and 3,664,604 control cases that were studied with GWASs and other statistical methods including a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach, functional mapping, and genetic correlations. A variety of statistically significant genetic polymorphisms were identified that can be attributed to the heritability of varicose veins affecting inflammation and immunity (eg, PPP3R1, EBF1, and GATA2), hypertension (eg, CASZ1), and vascular architecture (eg, CASZ1, PIEZO1, and STIM2). Protective variants (eg, GJD3, MMP10, and 4EBP1) were also identified in Finnish populations. However, replication studies showed that these genetic polymorphisms are not generalizable to specific populations.
Conclusions:
This systematic review highlights genes contributing to the development of CVD that have been identified in the literature. An improved understanding of genetic contributions to the pathogenesis of CVD may inform future diagnostics, prognostics, and personalized treatment. Further larger scale studies representative of global populations, including meta-analyses of genome-wide association datasets, are required owing to individual GWASs being statistically insufficient to draw generalizable conclusions.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

