Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Inter-specialty differences and knowledge gaps in acute and advanced heart failure care
Julia Baumberger1, Philippe Meyer2, Malcolm Kohler3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Stadtspital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Physician knowledge of heart failure (HF) varies significantly by specialty. Targeted education for general practitioners and hospitalists can improve care coordination and patient outcomes in HF management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) presents a significant public health burden, demanding coordinated care across general practitioners (GPs), hospitalists, and HF specialists.
- Despite therapeutic advancements, optimal HF management hinges on effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
- This study investigates physician knowledge gaps in HF epidemiology, diagnosis, and management within Switzerland.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and compare the knowledge of chronic, acute, and advanced heart failure (HF) among different physician specialties in Switzerland.
- To identify inter-specialty differences in understanding HF epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment guidelines.
- To inform targeted educational strategies for improving HF care coordination and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional online survey was administered between January and March 2025.
- Participants included general practitioners (GPs), hospital internists, and members of the Swiss Society of Cardiology HF Working Group.
- Survey data focused on knowledge of HF epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.
Main Results:
- HF specialists reported higher self-rated competence in HF management compared to GPs and hospitalists.
- Awareness of HF prevalence and sex disparities was noted, though GPs underestimated prevalence in specific populations.
- GPs showed lower accuracy in recognizing cardiogenic shock indicators and advanced HF referral criteria compared to HF specialists.
Conclusions:
- Significant inter-specialty disparities in heart failure (HF) knowledge persist, particularly concerning epidemiology, acute HF management, and advanced HF referral.
- Addressing these knowledge gaps through interdisciplinary education is crucial for enhancing guideline adherence.
- Improved physician knowledge and collaboration are essential for optimizing patient outcomes in heart failure care.
More Related Videos
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care