Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model
Published on: September 23, 2025
Reframing the fragility index as bias analysis: sensitivity analysis, P-values, parameterizations, and confidence
1Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02467, United States.
None:
The fragility index (FI) is generally presented as a metric to assess how sensitive the passing of a particular P-value threshold is to the number of changes in event status. In many cases, the "statistical significance" of a result may be quite fragile. An alternative interpretation of the FI is proposed that reframes it as a sensitivity analysis or bias analysis for particular forms of misclassification. The reframing also makes clear the comparative relevance of different analogues of the FI for survival data, such as that proposed by Xing, et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 0000;000(00):0000-0000) and others, and further moves away from more dichotomous interpretations concerning P-value thresholds.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Framing Effects
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Intervals
A...

