Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

425
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
425
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

467
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
467
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.9K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.9K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

7.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
7.4K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.3K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.3K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

6.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Bayesian nonparametric test of significance chasing biases.

Research synthesis methods·2017
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Estimation of the Patient-Weighted While-Alive Estimand.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage Multiple Test Procedures Controlling False Discovery Rate With Auxiliary Variable and Their Application to Set4 <math><semantics><mi>Δ</mi> <annotation>$\Delta$</annotation></semantics></math> Mutant Data.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Bayesian Nonparametric Sensitivity Analysis of Multiple Test Procedures Under Dependence.

George Karabatsos1

  • 1Departments of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science and Educational Statistics, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|December 15, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel sensitivity analysis for multiple testing procedures (MTPs) using Dirichlet process priors. This method quantifies uncertainty in MTP selection and reduces conservativeness in statistical discovery.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.4K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.4K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Statistical Methodology
  • Multiple Testing Procedures

Background:

  • Multiple testing procedures (MTPs) are crucial for controlling error rates when performing numerous statistical tests.
  • Existing MTPs often require a priori selection, potentially leading to conservative results or unquantified uncertainty.
  • Arbitrary dependence between p-values complicates MTP selection and performance evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a sensitivity analysis method for MTPs that accounts for uncertainty in MTP selection.
  • To provide a framework for quantifying the uncertainty associated with threshold-based decisions in identifying significant discoveries.
  • To reduce the conservativeness often associated with using a single MTP by considering a broader space of procedures.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method utilizes a Dirichlet process (DP) prior distribution to model the entire space of MTPs.
  • It supports MTPs controlling either the family-wise error rate (FWER) or the false discovery rate (FDR).
  • The method measures each p-value's probability of significance over the DP prior predictive distribution of all MTPs.

Main Results:

  • The DP-MTP sensitivity analysis method was applied to over 28,000 p-values from a large-scale educational dataset.
  • The analysis examined relationships between COVID-19 school closures and student academic/background variables.
  • The method provides uncertainty quantification for MTP decisions, enhancing statistical inference.

Conclusions:

  • The DP-MTP sensitivity analysis offers a robust approach to understanding uncertainty in multiple testing.
  • This method allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of statistical significance across a range of MTPs.
  • The approach is applicable to large datasets and complex research questions, as demonstrated in the educational context.